Obama Administration is Unbelievably Off Course on Libya: Are the President's Advisors Talking to Each Other, or to the President?

Judging from the badly bungled Libyan situation, evidently not. 

We have one guy from the Counter-Terrorism Center saying that it was an all-out September 11th terrorist attack to Congress. 

We have another embassy in Libya making apologies to the terrorists, without clearance from the White House. 

We have President Obama mumbling about the anti-Mohammed video being the cause.  His press secretary doesn’t have updated (or ANY) information. 

And the State Department is at war with CNN over some kind of journal that was recovered from one of the destroyed buildings in Benghazi belonging to our late Ambassador.  Secretary Clinton’s speech on the loss of Ambassador Stevens was the best speech I’ve ever seen out of her.  Yet she’s out there focused in on the video too.

A hundred terrorists wielding automatic weapons, RPGs and other heavy weapons  showed up at the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, and President Obama insists it was spontaneous, and in reaction to a video that was developed by an Israeli American?  NOT!

I trust the counter-terrorism guy more than President Obama, Secretary Clinton, or any political appointees who are making any noise in Washington.

I think Romney’s scored some points here, despite the media’s attempts to paint his remarks as “inappropriate.”  The White House remarks are the inappropriate ones as they have all the intelligence reports, yet are choosing to promote their own version of events.

The man in the White House has given all the wrong signals to the bad guys. 

Fact Checkers Aren’t Telling the Truth Either: Now The Fact Checkers Need to Be Fact Checked Too!

This is ridiculous!

I’ve long suspected that the “fact checkers” who are taken at their word by the media that their facts are correct actually weren’t.

Now a lot of web sites on both sides of the political spectrum have started cropping up, challenging the fact checkers.  

The “fact checkers” who had a field day with Romney and Ryan had major issues with some of their “facts,” including a GM plant that the Ryan mentioned had shut down during Obama’s term.  They started off by misquoting Ryan, then went off on their tangent.

Here’s the story on that “fact checking” issue, with video of what Ryan actually said.

Townhall.com did a piece on more “fact checking” as well.

The Townhall article above mentions that the “fact checking” are disguised OPINION pieces.  That isn’t right.  Do a Google search on “fact checking fact checkers”, and see what pops up.  Blows the credibility of the agency fact checkers right out of the water.

I wonder how many people believe the crap that the news networks are trying to shovel down our throats to get people to vote for their candidate.