His pal Vice President Biden also said recently that denying climate change is like denying gravity. Interesting choice of comments, since the science of gravity used the scientific method of proving it, while climate change science has sought to skip the scientific method entirely.
The reason they’re seeking to skip using established scientific principles to prove climate change is that there is a very real possibility that it will be scientifically disproven. The data just doesn’t support their arguments. Why else would they manipulate the data?
If Al Gore wants us to buy what he’s selling, his side is going to have to use established scientific methods of proving what he’s saying.
As for his claim of climate change being “settled science”---NO IT ISN’T! Not by the method that is accepted by the entire scientific community, unlike his global warming hubris.
No one denies that climate change has happened before. If it hadn’t, we’d still be locked in the last Ice Age. The region of the country I live in would still be under a sheet of ice nearly three miles thick.
What is in dispute is the role humans have had in recent times with regards to the ever-changing climate on Earth—changes that would be happening whether we were here or not.
Consider: humans weren’t around with today’s greenhouse gas emitting factories or cars 15,000 years ago to warm up the planet and cause the glaciers to retreat.
Also in dispute is the role that the sun and volcanic activity plays in the overall process. Until they figure that out, they have NO business telling us that their version of climate change is “settled science.” “Settled science” is a political term that has no place in a scientific debate.
If Al Gore wants to punish people for not buying his utter BS, he should go from door to door and do the job himself. Put up, or shut up, pal.
No comments:
Post a Comment