Sunday, February 28, 2016

Trump Can Probably Win Without the Support of White Supremacists: Why Is He Waffling on Denouncing the Ku Klux Klan?

As a self-declared enemy of the KKK, I don’t understand why Donald Trump seems to be half-heartedly denouncing David Duke and his KKK associates.

Trump may have made a big mistake.  

Any candidate who doesn’t come out against the Klan and other white power groups should quit the race.   And not admitting to a mistake isn’t working to Trump’s advantage.

Trump reminds me of the Hutu idiot who took to the radio in Rwanda in 1994,  and told his supporters to start “exterminating the cockroaches”, referring to the Tutsi minority in Rwanda.   One hundred days later, 800,000+ people were dead.

Trump is very careless with the kind of language that he uses.  Dropping race bombs and not standing up to people doing the devil’s work will divide this country even more than it already is.  It may even incite a race war, which is EXACTLY what racial troublemakers want.

Trump needs to change course and fast.  If he becomes the President, he needs to reverse the damage that our current President has already incurred on the nation’s already-fragile race relations.  Enough of the race bombs and half-measures. 

He has to tell David Duke off and make a lot of noise doing so, before the voters punish him either during the remaining primaries, or during the general election in November.

Tuesday, February 23, 2016

GOP Members of Senate Judiciary Committee Are Making a Major Blunder: They’ve Decided Not to Hold Confirmation Hearings for Potential Supreme Court Nominees in 2016

The Republican members of the Senate Judiciary Committee have decided to not hold confirmation hearings for any Supreme Court nominees in 2016, preferring a potential Clinton or Sanders Administration to nominate the next Supreme Court nominee in 2017.

They’ve lost their minds up there.

They’re going to look really stupid if they are forced to backtrack if President Obama nominates a conservative in response to their bone-headed move.  And in an election year, that could be a very costly mistake.  He might actually take this step out of pure spite.

Doing nothing is the kind of politics that people—mostly on the GOP side--are already up in arms about. 

Monday, February 22, 2016

Apple Needs to Stand It’s Ground Against FBI, and Not to Protect Civil Liberties: This is About the Government Not Doing It’s Job and Being Unable to Protect Sensitive Online Data

I’ve been going back and forth on the FBI vs. Apple situation and have finally come to a few conclusions.

First, the government cannot keep stuff safe online, and this involves coding or programming to defeat Apple’s latest security measures.  If hackers could, they’d steal our nuclear missile codes and try to sell them back to the government for bitcoins.

Anything that Apple gives to the FBI to unlock a terrorist’s iPhone is vulnerable to theft by nefarious individuals who would exploit the back door.   Destroy the code after it’s been used?  Wishful thinking.  What is deleted can be restored, if you have the right tools or training.   One-use coding?  Nope…hackers can get around that little problem too.

Next, why is the government bringing Apple in to fix their mistake?  The accused San Bernardino terrorist’s iPhone belonged to the county health department where he worked, and they could have installed software that would have given them complete access to the phone’s data.  They paid for the software but never installed it.   If a government owns the phone that an employee is using, they should be able to access the data at any time, especially if the employee leaves the government, dies, or is accused of a crime.  This is a huge screw-up.

Finally, I’m of the opinion that any politician who supports the government position deserves to have their data hacked and then released for public consumption.  They’ll be singing a different tune after they’re publicly shamed. 

Also, they can set the example for the rest of us, and not encrypt their phones or tablets or other electronic devices.  

I bet that even before Apple incorporated their security measures into their latest operating systems that Donald Trump had put an unlock code into his iPhone and other devices.  And yet he called for a boycott of Apple products until they help the FBI with defeating their iPhone security.  Any politician saying stuff like this doesn’t deserve a vote.

This is less about civil liberties, and more about government data being potentially stolen and used by hackers to open millions of locked phones.  That’s what this is really about. 

Apple doesn’t need to invoke the civil liberties argument; they’ve got plenty of facts about the federal government having stuff stolen by hackers and being unable to protect Apple’s source coding.

Here’s a partial list of computer breaches in the U.S. Government:

September 2009 through December 2011—U.S. Department of Health and Human Services breached 13 times.  Employee records of 300 employees believed to have been compromised.

March 2012—Environmental Protection Agency hacked, personal and financial data for 8,000 users stolen, including bank account numbers and Social Security numbers.

May 2012—Department of Justice had 1.7 gigabytes of data stolen by Anonymous, posted publicly.  Database contained sensitive information about crimes, criminals and crime victims.

June 2012—Multiple U.S. Navy servers breached, over 200,000 people affected.  Sensitive personal data stolen.

June 2012—Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) server breached, email accessed, attachments stolen along with Social Security numbers of 700 employees.

June 2012—U.S. Department of Energy breached by an employee, attempted to sell access to supercomputer to an undercover FBI agent.

June 2012—Department of Homeland Security breached, personal data stolen included access information to DHS servers.

October 2012—U.S. Army Chief of Public Affairs mistakenly posted sensitive information to a public database.  500 Army soldiers and employees had their personal data, Social Security numbers and other sensitive data posted.

October 2014—Denial of Service (DoS) attack from inside the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)’s own network. 

November 2014—White House network is breached, President Obama’s schedule was accessed.

November 2014—NOAA network was compromised by Chinese hackers.  Information of what was accessed has not been provided as of yet.

November 2014—USPS network was breached; personal information including names, addresses, phone numbers, emergency contacts, birthdates and Social Security numbers were stolen.  800,000 employees affected.

November 2014—State Department network breached; the Russian hackers got into State Department non-classified email systems.  Information gleaned helped hackers to go after and access the White House servers.

April 2015—FAA hacked; experts publicly worried that the nation’s air traffic control systems were vulnerable.

April 2015—Department of Defense breached.  Non-classified files were accessed.

May 2015—St. Louis Federal Reserve breached.  Internet traffic was redirected elsewhere.

May 2015—IRS breached.  334,000 taxpayers had their information stolen.  IRS reported that their main system was not affected.

June 2015—U.S. Army web site breached by Syrian Electronic Army.  Defacing of web site resulted. 

June 2015—Office of Personnel Management (OPM)—Government worker data stolen.  25,000 workers affected initially; after lengthy investigation it was discovered that the number was actually 22.1 million people affected.  Names, addresses, phone numbers, birthdates, Social Security numbers, and other sensitive information was stolen.

July 2015—Census Bureau—User accounts, audit information stolen and posted by Anonymous. 

August 2015—Pentagon—Email systems for 4,000 employees compromised by Russian hackers.

=============

Should Apple be concerned about trusting the government with coding to break the security of their operating system, given the (partial) list of failures above?

Um, in a word….YES!!!

Tuesday, February 16, 2016

Trump Calls Cruz “Unstable”: Trump Must Be Joking as He’s Obviously Talking About Himself

“Unstable” is not a term that is applicable to Ted Cruz.  That term fits Donald Trump perfectly, so it’s highly hypocritical that he’s calling someone else unstable.

Which candidate can’t get along with people who disagree with him?  Which candidate has to resort to name-calling and insults to distract the opposition from debating real issues?  Which one can’t let a feud go and move on?  Which one never apologizes because he’s “never” wrong?  Which one has gone on highly-public profanity-laced tirades when things aren’t going his way?  Which one is highly bombastic and a prima donna?

TRUMP’s instability makes him unfit to be President, so he should stop criticizing others from his highly-jaded point of view and address his own personal problems before attempting to transfer them to others. 

I still find it amazing that he’s able to label others with his own personal negative attributes so successfully.  The media eats that stuff up as the GOP candidates are being severely damaged by Trump’s antics and are responding in kind, so that the media’s preferred Democratic candidates have more source material to deploy against their eventual GOP rival.

Sunday, February 07, 2016

Getting Another Feeling About Tuesday: Trump Will Finish in Second Place (or lower) Thanks to His Sloppy Handling of the New Hampshire Debate

Trump’s true colors shown through at the New Hampshire debate, and he was getting booed by rank and file Republicans.  They didn’t seem too impressed with his entertainment act.  That debate was almost painful to watch…almost.

Prediction time: I have no idea who will win the state for the GOP side, but I’m getting the feeling that it won’t be Trump.  I think he’s going to finish in second place (or lower).   First place could be Rubio, or Cruz.

On the Democratic side, I think Sanders will take New Hampshire.  Democratic voters there seem to be in sync with his message, and Clinton still has major trust issues.

It may be that she will be charged with a crime.  Her email problems seem to be getting worse by the day.

It’ll be very interesting to see if the national and New Hampshire polls have it right, or if Trump’s voters stay home in New Hampshire, like his followers in Iowa did. 

The polls in Iowa showed Trump leading Cruz anywhere from 3-9% just before the caucuses started.   New Hampshire polls are showing Trump leading by double-digits.   If Trump loses, he’s going to be crying foul even more than he did over Iowa.   I don’t think it’s going to be as easy a win as Trump thinks.

Should be interesting.

Wednesday, February 03, 2016

Coin Tosses in the Iowa Caucuses? And Hillary Clinton Won 6 Out of 6 of Them?

According to this report, the chances of Hillary going 6/6 on coin tosses in the Iowa caucus was 1.6%.  Yet it happened, and gave Hillary the razor-thin victory in Iowa.

I’m not a fan of either Democratic candidate, but something’s really wrong here.  Sanders could very easily turn this mess into a court case, and I can’t say I’d blame him.   The Democratic math is pretty fuzzy.

The chaos shown in YouTube videos is confirmation of things going really bad.  You have to watch the entire video, especially when they start to compare numbers at the 1:11 mark of the video.

They’ve got to get their act together…hopefully this fiasco isn’t repeated in any of the other states who don’t do this kind of caucus.  I can see why Rush has referred to this process as the “Hawkeye Cockeye.”  What a mess.