A radical Sunni terror group launched a series of terror attacks in and around the city of Zahedan, Iran, over the last week, killing Revolutionary Guard militia members and prompting the Islamic press to claim that the bombs were American built.
That idea is ludicrous as Iran makes it's own bombs and has a black market for those Iranian bombs. It's more likely that they were Iranian-built bombs bought on Iran's black market, which has also supplied weapons to Iraqi insurgents too.
This is the Iranian press and government trying to blame their terrorist problems on other governments, despite Tehran's probable involvement in training these terrorists for action in Iraq. They didn't take into account the possibility that their terror trainees were going to take their weapons and use them on the people who are their real enemies--the Iranian military.
That's as good an explanation as Iran's, and probably not far off the mark either.
In any case, Iran should go bark up it's own tree.
Showing posts with label sunni. Show all posts
Showing posts with label sunni. Show all posts
Wednesday, February 21, 2007
Monday, February 05, 2007
Iraqi Government Says One Thousand People Died in Last Week: They Need to Get in Gear
A major crackdown from the Iraqi government cannot come soon enough, as the government there announced 1,000 people died in the last week alone.
That's WITH Iraqi and U.S. military forces in action, with an operational Iraqi government and a supportive U.S. government pushing for the Iraqis to do more to stabilize their country.
It's hard to imagine how bad things would get if U.S. and coalition troops pulled out immediately as some are suggesting.
It might make the slaughter in Rwanda and Darfur look tame by comparison.
"Peace at any cost" is a popular mantra of the anti-war movement, but the cost could be much worse than anyone thinks.
Sunni governments would begin mass shipments of weapons to the Sunni side to help them (as Saudi Arabia has already promised to do if the U.S. leaves too early) kill the Shiites, who vastly outnumber the Sunnis. Iran would support the other side. Both sides would be much more heavily armed than they are now, and more than one nation would send troops in to support their side.
There would be no peace at too high a price if things aren't carefully thought out. But one thing is absolutely certain:
The Iraqi government needs to get in gear and MOVE IT.
That's WITH Iraqi and U.S. military forces in action, with an operational Iraqi government and a supportive U.S. government pushing for the Iraqis to do more to stabilize their country.
It's hard to imagine how bad things would get if U.S. and coalition troops pulled out immediately as some are suggesting.
It might make the slaughter in Rwanda and Darfur look tame by comparison.
"Peace at any cost" is a popular mantra of the anti-war movement, but the cost could be much worse than anyone thinks.
Sunni governments would begin mass shipments of weapons to the Sunni side to help them (as Saudi Arabia has already promised to do if the U.S. leaves too early) kill the Shiites, who vastly outnumber the Sunnis. Iran would support the other side. Both sides would be much more heavily armed than they are now, and more than one nation would send troops in to support their side.
There would be no peace at too high a price if things aren't carefully thought out. But one thing is absolutely certain:
The Iraqi government needs to get in gear and MOVE IT.
Labels:
casualties,
iran,
iraq,
saudi arabia,
shiite,
sunni,
support
Sunday, January 07, 2007
Sunni Rage Builds Over Saddam Execution: All-Out Civil War is Now Within Realm of Possibilities
The Iraqi government's decision to execute Saddam Hussein is backfiring on them, big time.
Saddam was executed at the beginning of the Eid al-Adha holiday, on the day that the Sunnis were to begin the observance. Further, he was taunted by Shiite executioners in his last moments. Enraged Sunnis in Iraq and across the Arab world took to the streets and that anger isn't going away. It's worsening.
The taunting was inappropriate and the timing was simply terrible. Sunni and Shiite branches of Islam consider the other heretics, and this merely reinforces that belief.
By executing Saddam, they denied his other victims--living and dead--and their stories to be told in an Iraqi court of law and in Saddam's presence. They were all robbed of justice--all but 148, for whom Saddam was executed.
It's more likely that non-combatant Sunnis will join the fight against the Shiite government because they don't trust it, believe it's behind the attacks on the Sunni population, and doesn't respect their religious beliefs.
It's safe to say that Iraq is in more danger of fragmenting now than it was before the Iraqi government decided to be hasty and execute the former dictator, though he was causing no harm while he was in U.S. custody.
Was what the Iraqi government did justice for ALL of Saddam's victims, or could they have benefited by keeping this man tied up in court for years to come? The full scope of this man's reign of terror will never be fully explored now.
Saddam was executed at the beginning of the Eid al-Adha holiday, on the day that the Sunnis were to begin the observance. Further, he was taunted by Shiite executioners in his last moments. Enraged Sunnis in Iraq and across the Arab world took to the streets and that anger isn't going away. It's worsening.
The taunting was inappropriate and the timing was simply terrible. Sunni and Shiite branches of Islam consider the other heretics, and this merely reinforces that belief.
By executing Saddam, they denied his other victims--living and dead--and their stories to be told in an Iraqi court of law and in Saddam's presence. They were all robbed of justice--all but 148, for whom Saddam was executed.
It's more likely that non-combatant Sunnis will join the fight against the Shiite government because they don't trust it, believe it's behind the attacks on the Sunni population, and doesn't respect their religious beliefs.
It's safe to say that Iraq is in more danger of fragmenting now than it was before the Iraqi government decided to be hasty and execute the former dictator, though he was causing no harm while he was in U.S. custody.
Was what the Iraqi government did justice for ALL of Saddam's victims, or could they have benefited by keeping this man tied up in court for years to come? The full scope of this man's reign of terror will never be fully explored now.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)