CNN Caught Faking Palestinian Footage: They Need to Quit Manipulating Stuff to Suit Their Agenda

The degenerates at CNN are at it again, faking footage of the poor rocket-firing Palestinians taking casualties from the evil Israeli warmongers.

Gag me with a spoon!

CNN keeps screwing up; they’ve become nothing more than a propaganda arm of Hamas.   They need to present a more balanced view and keep their opinions to themselves.  They’re siding against the ONLY democracy in that region against terrorists; what does that say about CNN? 

I use the term “degenerate” as they’ve de-evolved from a news agency to a propaganda outfit.   They need to get off their collective butts, report the news and then shut up with their opinions. 

If the Air Force is Unwilling to Spend Money to Fix the Over-Budget F-22 Raptor, They Should Retire Them

The Air Force has been dragging their feet in fixing the F-22 Raptor’s in-flight oxygen system, and it’s time to put an end to the issue.

They either need to spend more money on the already-over budget F-22, or they need to retire the aircraft.   The pilots don’t think the aircraft is safe. 

They only have two options: fix it or retire it.  It can’t continue to fly as-is. 

This has gone on long enough.  Another F22 crashed yesterday in Florida short of the runway.  At $190 million per copy, they ought to be able to diagnose and fix ANYTHING on that aircraft. 

Fix it or cancel it. 

If Egypt Really Wants to Broker Peace Between Israel and Hamas, Then They Need to Tell Hamas to Stop Firing Rockets at Israel BEFORE Telling Israel Not to Retaliate: S0 Far They’ve Been Telling Israel to Cease Fire While Ignoring Hamas’ Firing Rockets Into Israel, Which Started the Israeli Response

Egypt’s new leaders are proving to be more hypocritical than their former ruler when dealing with Israel and Hamas.

Egypt and the Muslim world have been screaming at Israel to stop fighting, while ignoring Hamas and their rocket strikes on Israeli cities, which provoked the Israelis into returning fire.

If one of these other countries were being fired upon by terrorist groups, they’d already have sent in ground troops.  Israel’s response has been very limited by comparison so far, targeting rocket launchers, Hamas commanders, rocket storage facilities and Hamas terrorists. 

Unfortunately, because Gaza is so small and so packed with people, everything Israel has attacked so far is amongst the Palestinian civilian population.  And Hamas doesn’t care where it puts its military equipment either.  There was an image of a rocket launcher next to a mosque yesterday on various web sites.

If the Muslims really want peace, they need to be more even-handed and realize that Hamas is the main cause of the problem.  If they were to stop firing, so would Israel.  It’s just that simple.

I think the Muslim world is sacrificing the Palestinians to Hamas militarism, just to get at Israel.  Otherwise they wouldn’t be arming a terrorist group and screaming at Israel to stop firing back while ignoring Hamas’s attacks on Israel.

Ridiculous White House Notion Sparks Independence Drive in Twenty States: What is President Obama Doing?

President Obama’s web site has an incredibly stupid petition promise: gather 25,000 signatures by December 7th, and the Administration will deliver “a response.” 

Someone from Louisiana started a secession petition to allow Louisiana to leave the United States peacefully.  Individuals in nineteen other states followed suit, and of those petitions, the Texas petition just hit 25,000 signatures.

Now the White House has to waste time addressing their dumb move on the petition drives.

I’m also wondering what kind of people signed the petitions to begin with, and I cannot help but think that there are a lot of civilian militias, and fringe characters, along with people who are unhappy with the direction of the country.   

President Obama needs to put a stop to this nonsense before the militia types pick up arms and start all kinds of trouble that we don’t need.

Internet Should Remain Under Western Oversight and Not Go to an International Authority: They’ll Kill Free Speech on the Internet

One month remains before control of internet addresses shifts over to an international organization under the control of the United Nations.

Given the fact that the U.N. is being lobbied by Muslim countries to ban forms of expression that insults their religion, the U.N. cannot be counted on  to safeguard free speech online.

Western countries should work to make sure that the Dubai conference next month, sponsored by the International Telecommunications Union and sanctioned by the U.N., that they do not get control of the Internet.  This idea needs to be permanently derailed.

The ITU says there are no motions on the table to ban free speech, but how long can it be before one is?

It’s better to have the U.N. keeps its hands off the Internet.  

The U.N. dedication to free speech is only as strong as the member states’ dedication to free speech is.  And with many nations on earth locking up their own citizens for expressing their views, that’s a highly dubious proposition.

The Dubai conference should be cancelled and the UN and ITU told where to go.  If they don’t like it, they can start their own Internet and censor that!

Texas Threatens to Arrest U.N. Observers at the Polls: We Don’t Need International Supervision of OUR Elections

Texas has threatened to arrest United Nations officials if they show up at any voting locations in the state of Texas.  Good!

We don’t need the U.N. to play any part in our elections.  If they do show up, it will give the militia types more reasons to scream about U.N. troops taking over the U.S.

I think the U.N. has bigger fish to fry and can be more useful elsewhere in the world on November 6th.

Romney Should Have Openly Questioned Candy Crawley’s Impartiality at the Debate When She Kept Cutting Him Off: Moderators Should Not Be Influencing the Debate to That Degree

“Sit down, Mr. Romney.” 

Crawley should have just said “STFU Mr. Romney!!” and gotten any image of impartiality off the table.  She was awful and was tiled toward President Obama all evening long.

Reporters should limited to asking questions during the debate, not moderating, or they shouldn’t be from openly biased news outfits.  This would exclude CNN, Fox News, MSNBC, ABC News, CBS News, and NBC News from providing  moderators.  

What was the debate commission thinking, choosing a moderator who described Romney’s VP pick as a “ticket death wish”  in the days and weeks before the debate?  THAT’S IMPARTIAL?

Obama had to have help to fight off Romney in this debate, and he got it in the form of Candy Crowley, who managed to turn it into a three-way dance.

I was just watching one of the George HW Bush/Bill Clinton/Ross Perot debates on YouTube from 1992.  That was a well-run debate and looks like what a proper debate should look like, compared to last night’s train wreck of a debate.  She even got on CNN and admitted after the debate that she was incorrect about her Libya “fact check” and that Romney was “right in the main” but had chosen one wrong word.  Thanks for the clarification.

And what was she doing on CNN after the debate?  Spinning for Obama from the moderator’s chair?

Slate documented some of the problems with the train wrecked debate.  And this is coming from a liberal-leaning magazine, so there were huge issues with the debate last night that the left and right noticed.

Regardless of who won, there were major structural problems with how this debate was set up, how it was run, and how the candidates and audience acted during the course of the debate.

Can we get some independent news journalists and others in to moderate these debates? 

Obama Administration is Unbelievably Off Course on Libya: Are the President's Advisors Talking to Each Other, or to the President?

Judging from the badly bungled Libyan situation, evidently not. 

We have one guy from the Counter-Terrorism Center saying that it was an all-out September 11th terrorist attack to Congress. 

We have another embassy in Libya making apologies to the terrorists, without clearance from the White House. 

We have President Obama mumbling about the anti-Mohammed video being the cause.  His press secretary doesn’t have updated (or ANY) information. 

And the State Department is at war with CNN over some kind of journal that was recovered from one of the destroyed buildings in Benghazi belonging to our late Ambassador.  Secretary Clinton’s speech on the loss of Ambassador Stevens was the best speech I’ve ever seen out of her.  Yet she’s out there focused in on the video too.

A hundred terrorists wielding automatic weapons, RPGs and other heavy weapons  showed up at the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, and President Obama insists it was spontaneous, and in reaction to a video that was developed by an Israeli American?  NOT!

I trust the counter-terrorism guy more than President Obama, Secretary Clinton, or any political appointees who are making any noise in Washington.

I think Romney’s scored some points here, despite the media’s attempts to paint his remarks as “inappropriate.”  The White House remarks are the inappropriate ones as they have all the intelligence reports, yet are choosing to promote their own version of events.

The man in the White House has given all the wrong signals to the bad guys. 

Fact Checkers Aren’t Telling the Truth Either: Now The Fact Checkers Need to Be Fact Checked Too!

This is ridiculous!

I’ve long suspected that the “fact checkers” who are taken at their word by the media that their facts are correct actually weren’t.

Now a lot of web sites on both sides of the political spectrum have started cropping up, challenging the fact checkers.  

The “fact checkers” who had a field day with Romney and Ryan had major issues with some of their “facts,” including a GM plant that the Ryan mentioned had shut down during Obama’s term.  They started off by misquoting Ryan, then went off on their tangent.

Here’s the story on that “fact checking” issue, with video of what Ryan actually said.

Townhall.com did a piece on more “fact checking” as well.

The Townhall article above mentions that the “fact checking” are disguised OPINION pieces.  That isn’t right.  Do a Google search on “fact checking fact checkers”, and see what pops up.  Blows the credibility of the agency fact checkers right out of the water.

I wonder how many people believe the crap that the news networks are trying to shovel down our throats to get people to vote for their candidate.

USADA Needs to Obey U.S. Constitution: Suspects Are Innocent Until PROVEN Guilty

I've been following the Lance Armstrong story with a growing sense of anger.

To recap, Armstrong dropped his challenges against the U.S. taxpayer-funded USADA (United States Anti-Doping Agency), and the USADA took that to be an admission of guilt and stripped Armstrong of all his Tour de France achievements and recognitions.

That isn't right.

The USADA has to obey the U.S. Constitution, especially since they are U.S. taxpayer-funded, and they've targeted an American citizen.  All suspects are INNOCENT until PROVEN guilty, and they haven't proven anything.  They say they have evidence, but they haven't shown it to a judge.

Armstrong also doesn't have to incriminate himself, according to the Fifth Amendment.  And he hasn't said that he cheated, either.  He said he was tired of being tied up in court, with no end in sight.

If Armstrong had said that he couldn't afford really expensive lawyers to defend himself, would the USADA have said that it was an admission of guilt?  According to them, the answer is YES.  And that's also unconstitutional.

Also, if they had proof that Armstrong was using performance-enhancing drugs since the mid-1990s, why didn't they ban him then?  Why did they wait until after the guy won seven Tours, and retired from cycling to go after him?  That just smells of a political agenda.

Congress needs to reign in the USADA, and cut their funding if they're going to grandstand like this, and abuse their authority.

I'm not much of a cycling fan, but I'm less of a fan of witch hunts, which this definitely is.  Lance Armstrong has done a ton of good with his celebrity status and his Foundation., which the USADA can NEVER strip away.

There need to be some changes made to the way that this agency conducts business.

I don't care if Armstrong is a champion cyclist or not.  But proper procedures MUST be followed.

Politics 2012: Ho Hum

I'm waiting for President Obama and Governor Romney to start acting Presidential, and not like a pair of eighth graders engaged in a name-calling contest.  When they do, I'll start paying attention to their actual messages.  A few notes:

President Obama ran on nothing in 2008, and won, due to the fact that he was not running against John McCain; he was running against the highly unpopular President Bush and the tanking economy.  He's running on nothing in 2012, and since he has nothing constructive to say, he's throwing nothing but  mud in Romney's direction.

And Romney's been so busy dodging Obama's negative accusations that he hasn't gotten his own message out.  The addition of Representative Ryan to the Romney ticket will help Romney get his message out; I think this is good news for the overall Presidential campaign.

The sooner they start talking about issues, the better.

U.S. Government Owes China NO Apology for Attempted Defection of Chinese Dissident in Beijing, But It Does Owe the American People the Truth on WHY The Dissident Left the U.S. Embassy

China is demanding an apology from the United States government for the attempted defection of a blind Chinese dissident.

China can go jump in a lake, IF this is an official Chinese government demand.  I’m not certain if this is a Chinese media outlet making the demand, or if Chinese government officials are demanding it.  No U.S. apology is owed to China over this situation in either case.

Rather, China owes its own people an apology for treating its dissidents like this, to the point that they feel the need to flee to the safety of a foreign embassy to escape official Chinese government repression.  That’s just wrong.

The U.S. government needs to account for what happened, though.  Did a U.S. embassy official in China tell the dissident that Chinese officals were going to beat his wife to death if he didn’t leave the Embassy, as the dissident claims?  Or is he trying to generate sympathy?  What really happened?

This is a very troubling situation.   He should never have been talked into leaving the protection of the U.S. Embassy; I’m not sure we’ve done right by him.

Any apology from the U.S. to China on this issue is unacceptable.

Tax Masters Fined $195 Million for Deceptive Practices and Files Bankruptcy: Why Did So Many Advertisers Continue Running Their Ads Months After They Were Sued for Fraud?

Anyone seen this man on TV?

Anyone who watches CNN, Fox News, MSNBC, or other media outlets are familiar with the Tax Masters commercials that are played almost incessantly on those channels.

Very few of these outlets were unaware that they had been sued by two states for fraud.  Question:

Why did so many advertisers continue to advertise for a company that had been sued for fraud, and after some of these media outlets had done stories putting the company in a very bad light?

Some of the advertisers want to be paid now, but with the $195 million judgment against Tax Masters, and $1.7 million in listed assets, what are the chances that they’ll see it?  Zip.  Nada.

Here is a partial list of major advertisers who have been left holding the bag, according to Tax Masters’ bankruptcy filing:

CNN ($2.6 million)
Maxximedia ($1.3 million)
Fox News Channel ($938,000)
Westwood One ($676,000)
History Channel ($653,000)
MSNBC ($259,000)
Yahoo ($196,000+)
Weather Channel ($137,000)
ESPN ($94,000)

Instead of accepting more money for advertising on their respective mediums, which helped Tax Masters rip more people off, by the way, they should have refunded the money and refused to run more ads until Tax Masters had been cleared of wrongdoing.  Instead they kept running the ads.  Sad.

Representatives Join the Throng: They Know Nothing More Than Anybody Else

When we elect people to the House of Representatives or the Senate, we expect them to act in a way that is fitting to an elected official.  They should pass laws that are not made in the passion of the moment, and conduct themselves accordingly.

Three Representatives are not doing that.

They're all caught up in the Trayvon Martin situation, and are making horses arses out of themselves.

And once they cross that line, they need to decide what they're doing there, and if they can do their jobs.  If they can't, then they should resign and allow the voters of their districts choose someone who CAN do the job without resorting to race baiting.

Isn't that right, Congressman Bobbi Rush, Congresswoman Frederica Wilson and Congressman Hank Johnson?

These three individuals have no more idea as to what happened the day Trayvon Martin was killed, any more than anyone else does.  The difference is that they've also rushed to judgment, just like President Obama and "Reverend" Sharpton and Spike Lee and a lot of other people have.

Do your frigging jobs, elected officials, and set the example.  I suggest reviewing the parts of your oaths that say you swear to uphold the Constitution.  Even the parts that are inconvenient to you. 

SHAME ON YOU!

Spike Lee ReTweets Wrong Address for Location of George Zimmerman; Elderly Couple Has to Leave Their Home Because of This

Spike Lee, you idiot!

In the ongoing black lynch mob aggression against George Zimmerman, director Spike Lee decided to retweet an alleged address of George Zimmerman, who is in the center of the controversy over the killing of Trayvon Martin, and got it wrong.  HUGELY wrong.

Now an elderly couple has been forced to leave their home out of fear that vigilantes will break in and hurt them.  They've received all kinds of hate mail, threats and been forced out.

It's another sad chapter of this story of rushing to dead or alive vigilantism put on by President Obama, "Reverend" Sharpton, and the New Black Panther Party, and a lot of stupid people out there who are being lead along like SHEEP being prodded along by a shepherd in the WRONG DIRECTION!

Is President Obama going to call these senior citizens to apologize for what's happened to them?  Is "Reverend" Sharpton going to stand beside this couple on camera to tell the vigilantes to leave these poor people alone?  Is Spike Lee going to apologize for doing what he did?

I'll be shocked if they do.

And what about the idiot in California who started this?  He's done major damage.

This is the worst case of group-think that I've ever seen, from the observer-in-chief all the way down to the twits taking part in the demonstrations.  Shame on all of you!

Martin Shooting in Florida is an Example of a Modern Day Lynch Mob: People are Acting Totally Irrationally Without All the Facts

I’ve been watching President Obama and other black leaders lambast the guy who shot and killed Trayvon Martin, and their choice of words was equally as irrational as the black lynch mobs who have put a $10,000 bounty on the head of of his shooter.

Isn’t it bad enough that a man was shot and killed, without turning to the sort of vigilantism that blacks themselves have said that they have been the victims of in the past?   When will this cycle of viciousness end?

The race baiters like President Obama and Reverend Sharpton need to shut up, get the facts, mourn the dead and let the law take its course.  I’ll bet that neither of these leaders will admit that they screwed up, should the local authorities determine that the shooter was defending himself.

The New Black Panther Party should drop this idiotic bounty on this guy and let the wheels of justice turn WITHOUT their “assistance.'” A witness said that the victim was beating the hell out of the shooter, prior to the gunfire, which puts this into another category of law enforcement entirely.    That’s why the police haven’t arrested the shooter and are still investigating.

And ALL the people who have signed the petitions, and are holding rallies all over the place should remember that it is the job of the police and prosecutors to enforce the law AS IT IS WRITTEN, not as the lynch mob thinks it SHOULD BE.

Romney Is Going to Have a Hard Time Winning Michigan’s Primary: He Promised to Help the People of Michigan in 2008, But Then Got into Trouble in the Years Since

Mitt Romney’s campaign is in trouble in Michigan. 

As part of the 2008 primary season, he promised that he was going to help the people of Michigan get back to work if elected President, and people believed him.  Auto workers turned out in droves to support him.  He won the 2008 Michigan primary with their help and the support of a lot of others, but eventually withdrew from the race in favor of John McCain.

McCain lost to Obama, and Obama took office. 

The economy continued to tank.  The unemployment rate in Michigan skyrocketed, and the talk turned to bailing out the auto industry to save it.  

Romney went on record opposing the bailout and made critical comments about the bailout, which a majority of the auto workers, both laid off and current, supported.  The Obama Administration went forward with the bailout.

When Romney went public with his opposition to the bailout, it looked like he had broken his promise to help the people of Michigan to get back to work.  When he said that the auto industry should go bankrupt, that didn’t sit well with people in Michigan cities where the auto companies were the largest employers.  I can remember people down here talking about Romney’s statements and how displeased they were with him.

I think if Romney carries Michigan this time around, his majority will be a lot slimmer than it was in 2008, because I don’t see the auto industry supporting him this time around, the way they did four years ago.

There is no guarantee that Romney will carry this state at all.  It all depends on who turns out to vote on Election Day.  Whether the rest of Michigan was for the bailout, or against it, he’s lost a major block of voters.  That’s how it is.

Iran and North Korea Are Waiting in the Wings for the U.S. to Downsize Its Military: Cutting 500,000 Troops Will Lead into the Next Ground War, as History Has Already Shown Us

Every time an Administration cuts the United States armed forces, and focuses in on increasing air assets, the decision bites us hard and we end up in another land war.

That’s been the pattern since Truman downsized the U.S. military, following the end of World War II.  We went from an Army of eight million soldiers to an Army of 500,000 under arms.  The Soviets were emboldened enough to blockade Berlin, North Korea was emboldened enough to invade South Korea, then China was emboldened enough to enter the Korean War after most of North Korea was overrun by U.S. and U.N. troops.  This pattern was repeated again and again when a U.S. President would cut troops in favor of air superiority. 

We are definitely in danger of repeating history.  President Obama wants more unmanned drones instead of ground troops, but drones cannot maintain the peace as effectively as a powerful ground force can.

North Korea, Iran and Venezuela have been emboldened over the last ten years because we were fighting two major wars at the same time, and much of our military strength was involved in occupying Afghanistan and Iraq.  Before that, they were afraid of the American military, but they’re still in the mind-set that our military is too worn down to take them on at the moment. 

Those nations mentioned should be afraid of the U.S. military and where they might strike next.  Instead, if we cut the size of the Army and the Marines, we may end up fighting another ground war against an enemy who thinks they can win.  Especially North Korea.

They can make cuts elsewhere instead of getting rid of our ability to fight two major wars simultaneously.  And these kinds of cuts should not be made while we still have 97,000 troops in combat in Afghanistan.

GOP Sanctions Florida for Holding an Early Primary: Here We Go Again

The GOP hit Florida with sanctions today, because Florida had the brass to do what the remaining 48 states should have done as well: hold an early primary date.  Here we go again…

Here’s what I think of this:  New Hampshire and every other state in the union should have voted on the same day.

“That’ll never work?”  Wrong!  We hold a general election on November 7th in all 50 states, in no fewer than five time zones.  These candidates ran around to every county in Iowa, and there’s 99 of them.  They can make it work.

Instead, we are forced to follow idiotic rules of both parties that disenfranchise voters whose states who have dared to voice their opinion on the matter.

Except this time, the GOP is acting stupidly….last time it was the Democrats who robbed Florida and Michigan of their say in the selection of the respective nominees.   The GOP took half our delegates and laughed at the way the Democrats were handling it.

I don’t respect the GOP decision to punish Florida or any other state for violating the “no early primary” rule.  Every state should have pushed back after what happened four years ago, and scheduled their primary when THEY wanted it, regardless of the GOP or DNC preferences. 

If every state scheduled an early primary, these rules would collapse and a fairer system would emerge.   But when one or two states buck the system, the national Dems and Reps try to make examples out of them and end up punishing the people who they need to turn out on Election Day.

12/14/11 Update

Politics has taken a back seat for a while.  I should be back into it after the New Year, with the upcoming elections, and the 2012 nonsense just around the corner.