Thursday, March 31, 2016

It Looks Like FBI Will Not Share Information With Apple: They’re Opening Locked iPhones for Other Law Enforcement Agencies

I find it very interesting that the FBI has agreed to unlock other iPhones with their new iPhone hack within two days of hacking the San Bernadino shooter’s iPhone.

It’s still uncertain if the Arkansas phone that the FBI is going to unlock is the same iPhone model as the San Bernadino one (iPhone 5C) with the same operating system, or if it’s a different model.  If it’s an iPhone 6, Apple has a HUGE problem that renders their security features inoperable, rather than a problem with one model. 

If it’s just the 5C, I can see Apple offering free or reduced new iPhones of the iPhone 6 line that don’t have the vulnerability in return for turning in the exposed 5C.  I can see them doing this to retire the hacked model and reduce their liability exposure.

How long will it be before the FBI is hacked and their new unlock capability is stolen by criminals?   I have no doubt that there are individuals out there who are salivating at the prospect of stealing this secret and somehow making money off of it.

If that happened, I can see Apple retiring the 5C.  Wonder if they would sue the government for damages…that’d be a real turn of events.

Social Conservative in Name Only: A Real Conservative Wouldn’t Have Screwed Up on Abortion Question the Way Trump Did

“Three positions in three hours.”

Ted Cruz has long said that Donald Trump has no depth to his platform, and yesterday seemed to prove it.

Because Trump has supported both sides of this issue, it’s not surprising at all that he misstated his position on the abortion issue, then had to clarify things twice.  Now he’s got abortion rights supporters, anti-abortion foes and everybody in between howling about how he’s got things wrong.

A true abortion foe wouldn’t have made that kind of mistake.  And now he’s got a wedge issue that may really hurt his campaign in the coming weeks.

My reservations about Trump’s viability as a Presidential contender continue to grow by the day.

Wednesday, March 30, 2016

Secret Service Didn’t Seem to Think That Former BreitBart Report Was a Threat to Trump: This Flies in the Face of Trump Saying She Was a Threat

I prefer to leave the security analysis to the professionals at the scene, but Donald Trump’s defense of his campaign manager’s assault of a reporter doesn’t hold water.

The Secret Service guards who were around Trump made no move to stop her from pushing in on him.  Therefore, they did not consider her a threat, as Trump has claimed.  If she did what he’s claiming, the Secret Service would have been all over her and there would have been a massive scene.   Those ladies and gentlemen know what they’re doing.

She’s the one with the bruises on her arm, and with the audio of the interview.  I think Trump should let the law take its course without starting ANOTHER anti-woman vendetta on Twitter.  His opponents are already making political hay out of his comments on Twitter in the form of new political attack ads.

He’s very unlikely to stay out of it.

Tuesday, March 29, 2016

Another Lotto Winner Murdered: All States Should Give Winners the Option of Remaining Anonymous

If I won a multi-million dollar lottery ticket, I’d give serious thought to ripping it to pieces right in front of lottery officials after confirming that I had no right to privacy.  Better that than to live looking over my shoulder for the rest of my life, or hiring security guards, or moving to another state just to live in relative safety.

Do lottery officials not realize that people are dying because of the lack of anonymity? 

In the latest case, three people allegedly murdered a Lotto winner in Georgia in January after breaking into his house, taking him and his two-year old baby hostage and demanding money.  When they couldn’t find his wallet, they shot him.  Three were involved with the actual break-in and killing, but the four others were somehow involved as well, and the police are promising more arrests.

In a lot of the cases, it was family members who were the murderers, but lately it’s been strangers or casual acquaintances who have carried out the attempted armed robberies and murders.

Granting Lotto winners privacy will protect them from the people they don’t know.   Keeping their own mouths shut about their good luck may help deal with relatives who decide there’s some kind of score to be made.

The practice of trotting the winners out in front of the cameras for all to see to accept a huge check should come to an end.  How many people need to get robbed in their own homes at gunpoint, their families threatened, and the prize winners gunned down before these lotteries (in every state, and not just a few) get with the program?

This needs to get fixed.

Feds End Court Case Against Apple in San Bernadino Shooter Case: They Found a Way to Decrypt Shooter’s iPhone Without Apple’s Help

An Israeli company is rumored to have stepped forward and helped the FBI gain access to a locked iPhone that was used by one of the San Bernadino shooters, so the Department of Justice ended it’s court case to compel Apple to assist them.

While it’s good that they’ve gotten the information they needed, it’s still a very troubling situation.

Now Apple has to worry about this hack that defeated their much-vaunted security measures.   And the government may not want to give their back door away for Apple to patch.

That’s for them to sort out.  I think Apple made the correct move in refusing to assist the government in this case, as creating backdoors is just asking for hackers to steal the information and exploit it.   Someone always profits from stolen information.

What good is security if it’s full of holes and can be exploited by anyone?  That’s what would have happened if Apple had put back doors into their iPhone operating systems.  Software is available for employers to override passcodes on iPhones if someone is using a company phone.  The Health Department that the shooter worked for did not put the applications on their company phone, even though they had paid for it.

It’s unfortunate that our smartphones have become pawns in a much bigger game of national security vs. personal liberty.   Nature of the beast, I guess.

Saturday, March 26, 2016

When the Federal Government Went After the Italian Mobs in New York City, Who Did They Approach to Infiltrate the Mafias? ITALIANS! So Why is There Such a Backlash Against Having Muslims Do The Same Thing?

The liberal political establishment has been blasting the GOP presidential candidates for suggesting that they’d go into Muslim neighborhoods and recruit Muslims to report on extremists in their communities.

Excuse me, but that’s PRECISELY what the federal government did when they went after the Five Families in New York City.  They didn’t just recruit any Joe Blow off the streets, they recruited Italians and Sicilians to be informers.

The libs need to get off their high horses and get with the program and protect the country.   I detest the mess that they’ve made out of the immigration debate, and the fact that they’re attacking the Republicans for trying to clean up the failed policies of the current Administration.  And I especially detest that the author of those failures is leading the criticism of his potential successors for daring to clean up his mess.

Who knows, they might find a lot of cooperation in the Muslim communities, who have opened the doors of their mosques to law enforcement already.

We don’t want to be like Europe.  Their model is failing right before our eyes, and people who are doing nothing but going about their business are being blown up by an enemy that we’re supposedly “winning” against.  Thanks a lot, Mr. President.  What’s it going to take to get your attention, a huge bomb attack in Times Square?

I also found it very interesting that Obama criticized Cruz and attacked his new friends, the Castros, in the same speech.   I wonder if he said the same thing to their faces while he was on his vacation to Cuba?

Now the Secretary of Defense Has an Email Problem: Will He Get Off Scot-Free Like Hillary Clinton Has So Far, Or Will He Be Prosecuted?

I don’t get it.

The Secretary of Defense saw what was happening with Hillary Clinton and the amount of trouble she’s in for using personal email for official government business, yet he continued to do exactly the same thing with his own personal email for months after Secretary Clinton’s problems became public knowledge.

What was he thinking?  In many cases, Department of Defense communications are even more sensitive than State Department ones are. 

Now we’ll see if there’s a difference in how her scandal has been treated by the feds as compared to what happens to him.  If he’s prosecuted immediately, or forced to resign, we’ll know that the fix is in.  Actually, we already know that the feds have been avoiding taking aggressive steps against Clinton as she’s the frontrunner for the Democratic nomination.  If they prosecute, her campaign derails.

We’ll be watching this situation with great interest.

If Companies Want Us to Stop Using Ad Blocker Programs, Then They Should Stop Putting Battery-Draining, Invasive, Cookie-Depositing, Bandwidth-Hogging, Computer Slowing Ads That Don’t Respect Privacy on the Web: Did I Miss Anything?

I read over on CNET that companies are getting aggressive in their dealings with users who dare to use ad-blocking software to keep their privacy intact.

Hey, if they don’t like ad-blockers, then they should get the monster that they created back in the cage and throw away the key.  Better yet, slay their creation and come up with a less intrusive and privacy-invading way to make money.  

Any ad that drains the batteries on our devices is evil.  Any ad that uses up more bandwidth than necessary is evil.   Any ad that places a cookie on our computers without expressed permission from us is evil.  Any ad (or web site) that uses trackers is evil.  Any search engine that saves our searches to profile us  is evil (and very annoying and worrying).  Forcing ads on us should be an online crime.

I have medical training, and sometimes I have to look up the names of medications or conditions and what the common treatments are.  No, I am not RH-negative. No, I do not have an STI or Zika.  No, I do not have pancreatic cancer.  No, I do not have a blood disease either, nor do I have a penile or vaginal problem, or anything.  Nor do I have autism or autism-spectrum.  No, I do not have high-altitude sickness.  Yet I get carpet bombed with ads promoting sexual health, cancer treatment centers, condoms and other stuff that I have no interest in.

That’s why I started using ad-blockers and browsers that do not allow tracking.  And if they don’t want our interest or traffic, we’ll find the information elsewhere and spend our money elsewhere too, in excess of the money they’re making off their ads.

Instead of going after users who hate ads and trackers and who don’t want a footprint online, they should fix their own problem by themselves and leave us out of it.    Blaming US for THEIR problem is wrong.

Thursday, March 24, 2016

Obama Will Turn Up in Surprise Visit to Tehran or Pyongyang Before The End of His Term: He Seems to Be Working Off a Bucket List

President Obama seems to be working off a bucket list, and it wouldn’t surprise me if one morning we wake up to the news that President Obama turned up in Iran or in North Korea.  I think it’s possible that it will happen prior to the new President being sworn in on January 20th.

The visit to Cuba was an insult to Cuban Americans whose families were driven out of their homeland by the Castro regime and hate the Castro brothers.

We can improve ties with Cuba while still telling the Castros where to go, but President Obama didn’t do it that way.  

Keeping the Castros in power isn’t a good idea.

Friday, March 18, 2016

Hulk Hogan Wins Huge Lawsuit Against Tabloid Website Gawker.com : First Amendment Doesn’t Apply in this Case

Some web sites have been commenting that First Amendment rights are threatened by Hulk Hogan’s victory against tabloid website Gawker.com, but I don’t think that’s right.  

Someone made a sex tape recording without Hogan’s knowledge or permission and Gawker posted parts of the recording on its web site, and then refused to take it down.    Hogan filed a $100 million lawsuit against Gawker and put Gawker’s sleazy editor on the stand to defend his decision to post the illegal video onto the web site. 

The jury agreed with Hogan, and awarded him $115 million for his troubles, with punitive damages pending next week. 

The punitive punishment should be interesting.   I’m thinking it’ll be in the $20 million range. Gawker doesn’t have the assets to comply with the ruling.  

I’ve been reading opinions online that the Hogan lawsuit threatens the First Amendment, but I disagree.   Posting illegal porn is not protected speech and should never be considered to be legal by the courts.  

Hopefully this gives people putting “revenge porn” online some second thoughts before they destroy someone’s life.  There will be a price to pay, and that’s a good thing.

Thursday, March 17, 2016

Argentina Sinks Chinese Fishing Vessel: Like China, Argentina Has Established a 200 Mile Economic Exclusion Zone and This is the Result

A Chinese fishing vessel dared to fish inside Argentina’s 200 mile exclusion zone that they’ve established off their coastline, and the Argentinian Coast Guard opened fire and sent it to the bottom of the ocean.

China is demanding an investigation.  I hope they remember this when they start doing the same to ships that operate in their own disputed zone.  They haven’t done so yet, but they’re militarizing some of the reefs.  How long can it be?

The Law of the Sea Treaty establishes the 12 mile limit; China and Argentina are signatories. 

Anything past the 12 mile limit is and should remain international waters. 

I think our planet has enough trouble without adding the possibility of nations going to war over fishing boats and oil platforms.   Here’s a map that illustrates the problem.  With so many maritime borders overlapping already, tacking another 200 miles on compounds the problem.

China has claimed waters that are far beyond their territory.  From where the disputed islands are on the map, they’re definitely not Chinese.  Other nations have a much better claim on the islands and the surrounding waters.  A case was brought to the Hague, but China argued that it didn’t have jurisdiction. 

China’s entire argument is that it had a 2,000 year old claim to the islands.  If China was still ruled by an Emperor, that might hold more water, but China got rid of their last Emperor. 

Vietnam’s territorial claims are almost as vast as China’s, except their claims have been validated by the U.N.

The Philippines claims seem to be the closest to making sense.  The disputed islands are much closer to the Philippines than any other nation.

Here’s the timeline of the court case in the Hague between the Philippians and China.  The court is still deciding if it has jurisdiction to settle this mess, which I hope that it does. 

Tuesday, March 15, 2016

Kasich’s New Liberal Immigration Amnesty Stance Sucks: He Needs to Get Out of the Race Too

I don’t like the direction that John Kasich has gone in since I voted in the Michigan primary last week.

I voted for Cruz as it looked like Kasich’s stand was shifting even then, but I wasn’t sure.

What he was saying last week made a lot of sense.  Here’s his prior immigration stance as of last week, according to the ontheissues.org web site:

  • It's a silly argument to ship 11M illegals back to Mexico. (Nov 2015)
  • Focus of immigration should be to keep families together. (Sep 2015)
  • Latino immigrants will continue to play critical role in US. (Sep 2015)
  • Focus on border & guest workers, not birthright citizenship. (Sep 2015)
  • 1993: end birthright citizenship; 2015: not part of approach. (Aug 2015)
  • Seal the border with Mexico, support legal immigrants. (Jul 2015)
  • Open to pathway to citizenship, but doesn't like it. (Feb 2015)
  • Post-Sept-11 open-door melting-pot is essentially intact. (May 2006)
  • Limit the number of legal immigrants, and their benefits. (Nov 1996)
  • Voted YES on more immigrant visas for skilled workers. (Sep 1998)
  • Declared English the official language of the US. (Jan 1999)

But now, he’s making all kinds of noise about immigration and amnesty.  I don’t know if he’s pulling out all the stops to win in Ohio today, but I can’t agree with him on his new liberal policies on immigration.

I don’t have an argument with him from a religious point of view, but I don’t like the bait and switch that he’s pulled on voters who supported him previously.

I wonder how many of his prior supporters will support him now that he’s gone liberal on this issue.   He may have handed Trump a victory in Ohio.

Saturday, March 12, 2016

Rubio Needs to Get Out Now: If He Loses in Florida, It Could Be the End of His Political Career

I think Marco Rubio needs to get out of the race prior to Tuesday’s primary in Florida.

If he wants to stay in politics, he can’t lose Florida if he chooses to stay in.  Things typically don’t go well for primary candidates who lose their home states, especially if they aren’t the front-runner.

Hope he’s weighing his options.

Violence at Trump Events is Not Unexpected: Trump Has Actively Been Encouraging It With His Abrasive Language, Confrontational Rhetoric and Unwillingness to Adapt His Strategy

There has been a spike in violence at Donald Trump’s campaign events, and it’s not unanticipated at all.  A blind man could have seen it coming.

What I am surprised at is that it hasn’t happened much much sooner than now, and that no one has tried to shoot their way into one of his campaign events.   Even now, attendees at some of his events are saying they may have to kill his opponents if they don’t stop protesting.

Ridiculous!

Does Kristallnacht ring a bell?  I think parts of the country are on the verge of one, with Trump at the wheel. 

Historically, when a political leader calls for violence to deal with groups of people, violence ensues.  We saw it in Rwanda, we saw it in Iraq, and in Libya, during the breakup of Yugoslavia, and we’re seeing it in Syria on a daily basis.

Trump needs to cool it, before American people start to die.

Sunday, February 28, 2016

Trump Can Probably Win Without the Support of White Supremacists: Why Is He Waffling on Denouncing the Ku Klux Klan?

As a self-declared enemy of the KKK, I don’t understand why Donald Trump seems to be half-heartedly denouncing David Duke and his KKK associates.

Trump may have made a big mistake.  

Any candidate who doesn’t come out against the Klan and other white power groups should quit the race.   And not admitting to a mistake isn’t working to Trump’s advantage.

Trump reminds me of the Hutu idiot who took to the radio in Rwanda in 1994,  and told his supporters to start “exterminating the cockroaches”, referring to the Tutsi minority in Rwanda.   One hundred days later, 800,000+ people were dead.

Trump is very careless with the kind of language that he uses.  Dropping race bombs and not standing up to people doing the devil’s work will divide this country even more than it already is.  It may even incite a race war, which is EXACTLY what racial troublemakers want.

Trump needs to change course and fast.  If he becomes the President, he needs to reverse the damage that our current President has already incurred on the nation’s already-fragile race relations.  Enough of the race bombs and half-measures. 

He has to tell David Duke off and make a lot of noise doing so, before the voters punish him either during the remaining primaries, or during the general election in November.

Tuesday, February 23, 2016

GOP Members of Senate Judiciary Committee Are Making a Major Blunder: They’ve Decided Not to Hold Confirmation Hearings for Potential Supreme Court Nominees in 2016

The Republican members of the Senate Judiciary Committee have decided to not hold confirmation hearings for any Supreme Court nominees in 2016, preferring a potential Clinton or Sanders Administration to nominate the next Supreme Court nominee in 2017.

They’ve lost their minds up there.

They’re going to look really stupid if they are forced to backtrack if President Obama nominates a conservative in response to their bone-headed move.  And in an election year, that could be a very costly mistake.  He might actually take this step out of pure spite.

Doing nothing is the kind of politics that people—mostly on the GOP side--are already up in arms about. 

Monday, February 22, 2016

Apple Needs to Stand It’s Ground Against FBI, and Not to Protect Civil Liberties: This is About the Government Not Doing It’s Job and Being Unable to Protect Sensitive Online Data

I’ve been going back and forth on the FBI vs. Apple situation and have finally come to a few conclusions.

First, the government cannot keep stuff safe online, and this involves coding or programming to defeat Apple’s latest security measures.  If hackers could, they’d steal our nuclear missile codes and try to sell them back to the government for bitcoins.

Anything that Apple gives to the FBI to unlock a terrorist’s iPhone is vulnerable to theft by nefarious individuals who would exploit the back door.   Destroy the code after it’s been used?  Wishful thinking.  What is deleted can be restored, if you have the right tools or training.   One-use coding?  Nope…hackers can get around that little problem too.

Next, why is the government bringing Apple in to fix their mistake?  The accused San Bernardino terrorist’s iPhone belonged to the county health department where he worked, and they could have installed software that would have given them complete access to the phone’s data.  They paid for the software but never installed it.   If a government owns the phone that an employee is using, they should be able to access the data at any time, especially if the employee leaves the government, dies, or is accused of a crime.  This is a huge screw-up.

Finally, I’m of the opinion that any politician who supports the government position deserves to have their data hacked and then released for public consumption.  They’ll be singing a different tune after they’re publicly shamed. 

Also, they can set the example for the rest of us, and not encrypt their phones or tablets or other electronic devices.  

I bet that even before Apple incorporated their security measures into their latest operating systems that Donald Trump had put an unlock code into his iPhone and other devices.  And yet he called for a boycott of Apple products until they help the FBI with defeating their iPhone security.  Any politician saying stuff like this doesn’t deserve a vote.

This is less about civil liberties, and more about government data being potentially stolen and used by hackers to open millions of locked phones.  That’s what this is really about. 

Apple doesn’t need to invoke the civil liberties argument; they’ve got plenty of facts about the federal government having stuff stolen by hackers and being unable to protect Apple’s source coding.

Here’s a partial list of computer breaches in the U.S. Government:

September 2009 through December 2011—U.S. Department of Health and Human Services breached 13 times.  Employee records of 300 employees believed to have been compromised.

March 2012—Environmental Protection Agency hacked, personal and financial data for 8,000 users stolen, including bank account numbers and Social Security numbers.

May 2012—Department of Justice had 1.7 gigabytes of data stolen by Anonymous, posted publicly.  Database contained sensitive information about crimes, criminals and crime victims.

June 2012—Multiple U.S. Navy servers breached, over 200,000 people affected.  Sensitive personal data stolen.

June 2012—Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) server breached, email accessed, attachments stolen along with Social Security numbers of 700 employees.

June 2012—U.S. Department of Energy breached by an employee, attempted to sell access to supercomputer to an undercover FBI agent.

June 2012—Department of Homeland Security breached, personal data stolen included access information to DHS servers.

October 2012—U.S. Army Chief of Public Affairs mistakenly posted sensitive information to a public database.  500 Army soldiers and employees had their personal data, Social Security numbers and other sensitive data posted.

October 2014—Denial of Service (DoS) attack from inside the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)’s own network. 

November 2014—White House network is breached, President Obama’s schedule was accessed.

November 2014—NOAA network was compromised by Chinese hackers.  Information of what was accessed has not been provided as of yet.

November 2014—USPS network was breached; personal information including names, addresses, phone numbers, emergency contacts, birthdates and Social Security numbers were stolen.  800,000 employees affected.

November 2014—State Department network breached; the Russian hackers got into State Department non-classified email systems.  Information gleaned helped hackers to go after and access the White House servers.

April 2015—FAA hacked; experts publicly worried that the nation’s air traffic control systems were vulnerable.

April 2015—Department of Defense breached.  Non-classified files were accessed.

May 2015—St. Louis Federal Reserve breached.  Internet traffic was redirected elsewhere.

May 2015—IRS breached.  334,000 taxpayers had their information stolen.  IRS reported that their main system was not affected.

June 2015—U.S. Army web site breached by Syrian Electronic Army.  Defacing of web site resulted. 

June 2015—Office of Personnel Management (OPM)—Government worker data stolen.  25,000 workers affected initially; after lengthy investigation it was discovered that the number was actually 22.1 million people affected.  Names, addresses, phone numbers, birthdates, Social Security numbers, and other sensitive information was stolen.

July 2015—Census Bureau—User accounts, audit information stolen and posted by Anonymous. 

August 2015—Pentagon—Email systems for 4,000 employees compromised by Russian hackers.

=============

Should Apple be concerned about trusting the government with coding to break the security of their operating system, given the (partial) list of failures above?

Um, in a word….YES!!!

Tuesday, February 16, 2016

Trump Calls Cruz “Unstable”: Trump Must Be Joking as He’s Obviously Talking About Himself

“Unstable” is not a term that is applicable to Ted Cruz.  That term fits Donald Trump perfectly, so it’s highly hypocritical that he’s calling someone else unstable.

Which candidate can’t get along with people who disagree with him?  Which candidate has to resort to name-calling and insults to distract the opposition from debating real issues?  Which one can’t let a feud go and move on?  Which one never apologizes because he’s “never” wrong?  Which one has gone on highly-public profanity-laced tirades when things aren’t going his way?  Which one is highly bombastic and a prima donna?

TRUMP’s instability makes him unfit to be President, so he should stop criticizing others from his highly-jaded point of view and address his own personal problems before attempting to transfer them to others. 

I still find it amazing that he’s able to label others with his own personal negative attributes so successfully.  The media eats that stuff up as the GOP candidates are being severely damaged by Trump’s antics and are responding in kind, so that the media’s preferred Democratic candidates have more source material to deploy against their eventual GOP rival.

Sunday, February 07, 2016

Getting Another Feeling About Tuesday: Trump Will Finish in Second Place (or lower) Thanks to His Sloppy Handling of the New Hampshire Debate

Trump’s true colors shown through at the New Hampshire debate, and he was getting booed by rank and file Republicans.  They didn’t seem too impressed with his entertainment act.  That debate was almost painful to watch…almost.

Prediction time: I have no idea who will win the state for the GOP side, but I’m getting the feeling that it won’t be Trump.  I think he’s going to finish in second place (or lower).   First place could be Rubio, or Cruz.

On the Democratic side, I think Sanders will take New Hampshire.  Democratic voters there seem to be in sync with his message, and Clinton still has major trust issues.

It may be that she will be charged with a crime.  Her email problems seem to be getting worse by the day.

It’ll be very interesting to see if the national and New Hampshire polls have it right, or if Trump’s voters stay home in New Hampshire, like his followers in Iowa did. 

The polls in Iowa showed Trump leading Cruz anywhere from 3-9% just before the caucuses started.   New Hampshire polls are showing Trump leading by double-digits.   If Trump loses, he’s going to be crying foul even more than he did over Iowa.   I don’t think it’s going to be as easy a win as Trump thinks.

Should be interesting.

Wednesday, February 03, 2016

Coin Tosses in the Iowa Caucuses? And Hillary Clinton Won 6 Out of 6 of Them?

According to this report, the chances of Hillary going 6/6 on coin tosses in the Iowa caucus was 1.6%.  Yet it happened, and gave Hillary the razor-thin victory in Iowa.

I’m not a fan of either Democratic candidate, but something’s really wrong here.  Sanders could very easily turn this mess into a court case, and I can’t say I’d blame him.   The Democratic math is pretty fuzzy.

The chaos shown in YouTube videos is confirmation of things going really bad.  You have to watch the entire video, especially when they start to compare numbers at the 1:11 mark of the video.

They’ve got to get their act together…hopefully this fiasco isn’t repeated in any of the other states who don’t do this kind of caucus.  I can see why Rush has referred to this process as the “Hawkeye Cockeye.”  What a mess.