Pakistan's Government is Wrong About How Bhutto Died: New Video Clearly Shows Her Slumping Immediately After Gunshots Began

Pakistan's government is not helping it's own cause by insisting that Bhutto died from hitting the sunroof of her armored car and that there was no bullet damage or bomb blast damage that contributed to her death.

New video shows that Bhutto's head scarf was flapping wildly immediately after the gunshots began and just before she slumped forward. The scarf was clearly flapping in the opposite direction of where the gunmen opened fire.

It looks like Pakistan's government is engaged in a cover-up and that they got caught red-handed. This does not bode well for their attempts to be transparent in this situation.

Assassination of Benazir Bhutto is a Major Setback: Pakistan in Chaos

Yesterday was a very bad day for all of Pakistan, and for the U.S. as well.

The assassination of former Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto at the hands of terrorists in Pakistan was a major blow to U.S. counter-terrorism efforts in the region, and a major setback for efforts to reform Pakistan into a democratic state.

Pakistan was already volatile; with the death of Bhutto, rioting has broken out all over the nation; her followers blamed the government of Pakistan for having a hand in the assassination; close to thirty people have died in the violence. Troops are on the streets, with orders to shoot to kill.

I think there's a very real danger of the government of Pakistan collapsing; the time may soon come where U.S. forces will have to swoop in and seize Pakistan's nuclear arsenal to keep them out of the hands of the extremists who will take over and have possession of the launch codes. I can't see India sitting idly by either if the nukes fall into the hands of terrorists. This could be very bad.

It would be better if President Musharraf resigned immediately and turned the power over to a caretaker government. He's causing more problems than he's solving by staying in office. And the U.S. government has to make a choice in either supporting the people of Pakistan, or supporting the troublesome Musharraf at the expense of the Pakistani people.

What a mess.

Michigan Voters Told Their Vote is Worthless in One Party's Primary and Only Worth Half A Vote in the Other: Tell Me Again Why We Should Vote on 1/15?

The Michigan primary is coming up on January 15th, and the ballot is still a mess.

One party has completely disenfranchised Michigan's voters, while the other has stripped Michigan of half of its delegates to the party's national convention, effectively turning every vote into a half-vote.

The Democratic Party added insult to injury when most of the Democratic candidates decided to withdraw their names from the ballot and announced that they were boycotting Michigan's primary. Not one of them had the guts to come into the state and announce it in person.

As far as I'm concerned, the candidates that withdrew their names shouldn't be able to fundraise here for their primary campaigns either. They should be writing refund checks out to every Michigan voter who has contributed money to their campaigns from the time that they announced their candidacy to today.

They can go to the Federal Election Commission web site to figure out who to write the checks to. In the meantime, they can go play in traffic.

On the GOP side, the Republican National Convention stripped Michigan of half of it's delegates to their convention, along with all the other January primary states. Following that same formula, the GOP candidates should also return 1/2 of the money raised here. They can take my half-vote and stick it where the sun don't shine.

So, since our votes are worthless in the Democratic Party, and worth a half-vote in the GOP, why exactly should Michigan voters show up on January 15th?

I'm not voting on the 15th; and I'm voting 3rd party in the fall. And all because the two National Committees chose to defend the current system and punished states that dared to buck the system to protest the inherent unfairness of the current primary system. There should be one national primary day, with all states being treated equally, not four of the states being elevated at the expense of all others.

It would be poetic justice if there was a tie in the electoral college in November, and it all fell to Michigan to cast the deciding vote. That won't happen, of course, but then, who figured that it would all boil down to Florida in 2000, which both parties have chosen to disenfranchise as well as Michigan? They really ought to think about that.

Merry Christmas!

Merry Christmas everyone!!

Vacation

Getting caught up on my posts. Will take a little while to get everything updated.

Fistfight on the House Floor: Not the Lawmakers...the PAGES??!

The congressional page saga continues to go from odd to outright weird. One year after a Florida congressman resigned and went home in disgrace because of his sexually explicit text messages to male pages, other pages are getting into the act.

Five pages have been sent home in the last three months for everything from oral sex in an elevator at the page dorm to shoplifting to fistfighting on the House floor.

What the??!

These kids are supposed to be the cream of the crop from across the country. What is happening with the House page program? I thought this stuff was being addressed in the wake of the scandal involving the congressman mentioned above. Instead, two Republican House members have resigned over how the program is being administered.

Can't Congress get ANYTHING right?

Oprah Joins Obama Campaign: Is This a Smart Move on Obama's Part?

The news media is making a big deal about the fact that Oprah Winfrey is joining the Barak Obama campaign for part of a tour through Iowa, South Carolina and New Hampshire.

Does Obama really want the distraction that someone like Oprah will bring with her? Who's the media going to be more interested in talking to: Obama or Oprah?

Can Obama really afford this, with the race being as tight as it is?

While I compliment Oprah for becoming involved in the campaign as actively as she has, I don't think that celebrities should be sharing the stage with the candidates. It takes the focus off the candidate. Part of the public's imagination will be captured by the Obama/Oprah alliance, but who will the media pay more attention to?

Mark my words, they'll tune in to Oprah, every single time.

Reid Proposes Doing Cartwheels Down Aisles of Senate to Draw Attention to GOP Blocks of Democratic Legislation: Poor Baby

Senate Majority Leader Reid is growing more frustrated with his inability to get the Senate to pass Democratic bills and stooped to proposing that legislators do cartwheels on the floor of the Senate to draw attention to President Bush's "49 puppets" who are in his way.

Poor Senator Reid. Perhaps he should resign and turn the leadership of the Senate over to someone who is more capable of working with the puppets to pass needed legislation.

But first, I'd like to see him try to do a cartwheel, along with some of his associates. The fat ones can stay in their seats. No need to break a hip or anything else and cause more of a farce in the Senate above and beyond what's happening right now under Senator Reid's outstanding leadership.

Cartwheels, my afterburner!

Venezuela's Collapsing Economy Should Be Watched Carefully in This Country: There's a Valuable Lesson for the U.S. Government to be Found Here

Venezuela's out-of-control spending increased their inflation by an amazing 4.4% last month to 18.6%, according to international economists. And it looks to get much worse unless it's government reigns in it's own spending. If it keeps up at that rate, Venezuela's oil profits will not be enough to keep it above water.

And now there are reports of shortages of basic goods and food in Venezuela, which could seriously destabilize the communist wanna-be government of Hugo Chavez. Food costs in Venezuela have gone up 33% in spite of government attempts to influence prices of major domestic commodities.

People in our own government should be watching what's happening to prices in Venezuela's economy and declining currency, as the same thing could happen here if Congress and the White House don't get a handle on OUR out-of-control government spending.

As it is, the U.S. debt is somewhere near $10 trillion. Venezuela's debt is a fraction of ours, but Venezuela doesn't have the economic power that our nation does and so is much more vulnerable to economic chaos than we are. When our economy declines, it's a gradual event. But in a smaller nation like Venezuela, it's like someone's hit the fast forward button. Changes are quite sudden and get real bad, real fast.

Are the decision-makers in this country paying attention?

Romney Shouldn't Have to Make a Speech on His Religious Views to Appease Religious Right

It seems to me that religious Conservatives shouldn't be criticizing Mitt Romney over his religious views. If he adheres to his religious beliefs, which at it's base professes a belief in God and in Jesus Christ, then there really shouldn't be an issue.

This all sounds familiar. The arguments being made against Romney's Mormon faith are similar to what fundamentalists have made against Catholic candidates ever since the country was founded. "That religion isn't even Christian" is nothing but 18th and 19th Century Protestant propaganda. Yet it shares some of the beliefs of both Protestant and Catholic churches, despite having some major differences.

People have a narrow view of history. Since our country was started, there have been four Baptists, one Catholic, one Congregationalist, three Disciples of Christ, two Dutch Reformed, twelve Episcopals, one Jehovah's Witness (later a Presbyterian), four Methodists, five Presbyterians, two Quakers, four Unitarians, and four people who did not belong to a religious denomination (including Abraham Lincoln) or didn't have a belief in God at all, who have served as President of the United States.

People use the JFK speech on his Catholic beliefs to justify what Romney is doing now. I don't think it's necessary. Haven't we, as a nation and as an electorate, evolved beyond this?

What should be worrisome should be where Romney stands on abortion now, where he stands on seeking an eventual end to the ground war in Iraq, what kind of judges he will nominate, and where he stands on protecting the Constitution vs. "National Security."

There are aspects of the Mormon faith that I do find very troubling, but I've known enough Mormons to know that there's two sides to an issue when discussing this religion. And it seems that those who are criticizing Romney are focusing on one side exclusively (their issues with Romney's religion) versus how the man has lived his life, which is quite a bit better than some of the others on the GOP ticket that the fundamentalists themselves are supporting.

Personally, I think Huckabee and Romney would be a great GOP ticket against the eventual Democratic nominee and his/her VP choice.

Latest Iraq War Film Bombs at Box Office: More Proof That Hollywood Needs to Shift Gears

The latest Iraq War film, "Redacted", utterly bombed at the box office, taking in a paltry $25,628 across the country in it's opening weekend. It's a portent of things to come when (IF at this point) it goes into wide release.

It's more proof that Iraq War films are not appealing the the American viewing public, and that Hollywood needs to get out of Iraq War films until after the war is over. It joins "Lions for Lambs", "Rendition" and "In the Valley of Elah" in the trash can for box office performances.

Anti-war films at this juncture are boring, depressing and a waste of money for the studios.

Are the Hollywood elites getting it yet?

Democrats Are Using Back Door to De-Fund Iraq War: $50 Billion Funding Bill Stalls in Senate Until January

It appears that the anticipated de-funding of the Iraq War by the Democrats is currently underway. But they're not taking the direct approach as was predicted by analysts.

Instead, they're guaranteeing that their legislation on war funding either doesn't make it to the President's desk, or if it does that he is certain to veto it. All the Democrats have to do is insert a clause that calls for withdrawal from Iraq to doom the legislation.

They have effectively de-funded the war, without drawing attention to the fact that this is/was their goal. They can publicly claim that they won't de-fund the Iraq War and will continue to put forth bills with terms and conditions that the Republicans find indigestible and will move to block.

The other tactic being employed is that the Democrats are ignoring the President's war funding requests for months at a time. Congress has already passed the Pentagon's $471 billion budget but stripped war funding from that bill. President Bush asked for $192 billion more in supplemental spending for the wars since mid-February; Congress is getting around to that request now, in mid-November.

The war bill passed by the House and rejected by the Senate would have provided $50 billion for the wars, and set the end of 2008 as a withdrawal date of troops from Iraq.

There's a time-crunch in play here; the current war funding will run out in February, and the military will have to divert money out of it's new $471 billion budget--money needed for repairing battle-damaged equipment or replacing it, beefing up V.A. hospitals, building mine-resistant vehicles, providing care for our wounded warriors, and purchasing new weapons platforms--to pay for the wars.

They've already signaled that they're diverting $4 billion immediately.

And the military is planning to make deep cuts when the designated war-fighting funding runs out in February. And it probably will; the only war funding bill on the table and on the horizon has been KO'ed.

Another mess.

Columnist Novak Says Clinton Campaign Has Dirt on Obama But Has Chosen Not to Use It: What's Really Going On Here?

Columnist Robert Novak is claiming that Hillary Clinton's campaign has dirt on rival Barak Obama, but is not using it as it makes her look like she's taking the high road.

Does Clinton have dirt on Obama? Possibly. It's in her nature to utterly destroy her opponents, regardless of what she says.

Since she's gone through the trouble of having her people dig up dirt on Obama, why is she holding back their findings now? Friendship? A friend doesn't look for scandalous information on a friend in the first place. Especially if that dirt is meant to be publicly released to publicly harm that friend.

It should be noted that Hillary's and Bill's friends end up in jail. Remember the Whitewater fiasco?

That's what Hillary does to people she calls friends. Her reputation on this point is pretty solid, so any claims of friendship that Hillary makes to Obama with regards to the current situation should be taken by Obama as a stark warning of what she'll pull on him if he starts winning Democratic primaries left and right.

If she does have information, someone in her campaign will leak it to prevent Obama from gaining the nomination.

Michael Savage Clashes With Council on American-Islamic Relations and Media Matters: Savage Nation Targeted in Advertisement Boycott

Michael Savage is well-known as a far-right winger with very strong ideas on immigration, Islam, the Democrats, the degradation of American culture and other conservative topics that he talks about on his nationally syndicated radio program, the Savage Nation.

There are times that he's a rabid wolverine, going after a subject and not letting it go until his target is destroyed.

On his October 29th show, he lit up and went after Islam, which caused the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) to began a campaign to get advertisers to stop supporting the Savage Nation. One company has pulled it's advertising so far; others are considering their courses of action. NOTE: the link above goes to his rant. You have to hit the play button; adjust your volume accordingly. He's quite an expert at screaming at the top of his lungs.

His Wikipedia entry is quite interesting too. I hadn't realized that he founded the Paul Revere Society. I do think that Savage goes too far sometimes. His criticisms are at times unfair, while other valid points that he makes are lost by how he presents it. He's his own worst enemy.

I think he needs to breathe a little bit.

But I'm also concerned about the line between free speech and bigotry/hatred, which sometimes gets blurred. Savage hasn't helped matters in this regard. In exercising his Constitutionally-guaranteed free speech in this particular way, he's helped to make it possible for groups like CAIN and Media Matters to target those with a right-wing bend in their views, with free speech suffering major collateral damage in the process. This is not good.

Here's an example of Savage's using a sledgehammer to kill a mosquito: during his brief tenure with MSNBC in 2003, someone called Savage's program (a prank caller) and commented on Savage's teeth. The conversation went thus (this is also in Savage's Wikipedia entry):

Savage then asked if the caller was a sodomite, to which the caller answered, "Yes."

Savage then said to the caller, "Oh, so you're one of those sodomites. You should only get AIDS and die, you pig; how's that? Why don't you see if you can sue me, you pig? You got nothing better to do than to put me down, you piece of garbage? You got nothing to do today? Go eat a sausage, and choke on it. Get trichinosis. Now do we have another nice caller here who's busy because he didn't have a nice night in the bathhouse who's angry at me today? Put another, put another sodomite on....no more calls?...I don't care about these bums; they mean nothing to me. They're all sausages."

Savage can say what he wants on his radio program; but I think his delivery of his content can be greatly improved and polished. And he can keep anti-conservative groups like CAIN and Media Matters at bay.

I'm not going to comment on his rant against Islam. I think he did raise some valid points, but his points were lost at about 120 decimals.

Hollywood is Learning a Lesson on Anti-Iraq War Films: Movie After Movie Flops at the Box Office

The latest and the not-so-greatest thing coming out of Hollywood has been a slew of anti-Iraq War films. And every one of them has been a box office failure. People don't want to go to a negative movie when events in reality are already so negative.

Here's the latest takes:

"Rendition" with Reese Witherspoon and Jake Gyllenhaal---$10 million domestically--a "disastrous" performance. It's been in theaters since October 19th.

"The Kingdom" with Jamie Lee Fox--$47 million domestically--budget was $70 million, so this one didn't fare as well as expected either. It's been in theaters since September 28th.

"In the Valley of Elah"--an independent film with Tommy Lee Jones, made $7 million. It was said to be a good film, but the subject--a father investigating the death of his son in Iraq--was too much for a war-weary U.S. public to stomach.

"Home of the Brave" with Samuel L. Jackson made a paltry $43,753 domestically. This was released in December of 2006, then widely released in May of 2007 before being pulled. Somehow "disaster" doesn't even begin to cover it.

And most recently, Robert Redford's film "Lions for Lambs" with Tom Cruise made $2 million on opening. This is much weaker than anticipated and may be a sign of things to come for this film.

Hollywood ought to be reluctant to put out multi-million dollar films based on the Iraq War right now. They should be waiting for a few years after the war ends to start producing this stuff; it might attract more people.

All they have to do is look to the past: Vietnam-era films produced in the 1980s did well: "Full Metal Jacket" made $46 million on a $30 million budget; "Platoon" made $138 million on a $6 million budget. "Good Morning, Vietnam" made close to $124 million. "Apocalypse Now", made in 1979, just six years after American troops were pulled from Vietnam, made $83 million. "Rambo: First Blood" made $47 million on a $15 million budget.

With a war in progress, Hollywood needs to pay closer attention to the mood of the viewing public when they produce Iraq War-era films.

Spanish King Tells Loudmouth Venezuelan President Chavez to Shut Up

There's been a conference going on in Chile the last couple of days, which is supposed to bring together Spanish and Portugese-speaking nations to promote unity and goodwill. Spain and Venezuela are two of the nations that are there.

Venezuelan President Chavez turned his wrath on a former Spanish prime minister, accusing him of being a fascist and a snake before the King of Spain angrily told him to shut up.

The BBC was there to record it all.

Leave it to the "Mouth of the South" to offend the King of Spain.

Retailers Are in for a Disastrous Holiday Season: Recalls Due to Lead Paint Will Be the Reason

Retailers are going to have a very bad holiday season this year. With the economy already in bad shape, the list of recalled toy products from China is growing longer and longer. The #1 reason for the recalls is lead paint.

There's a good bet that there will be a huge recall just before the holiday shopping season really starts, which will put the retailers into a tailspin.

The retail sector is in big trouble. This is what happens when manufacturing is shipped overseas in the name of more profits when the finished product hits the market. Eventually it comes around and bites everybody HARD.

Welcome to the dark side of globalization.

The Place Where the "Save the Planet" People Won't Go: Take the Emotionalism Out of the Global Warming Debate, and Then Look at What's Left

One of the most infuriating things about the global warming debate is all the emotionalism that the "Save the Planet" side uses to get people to buy in to the global warming debate. It's getting in the way of an examination of the pure, unblemished facts that have been suppressed.

There's a place that the global warning panic-mongers refuse to acknowledge or go to, because it turns their arguments into pure folly that is similar to the "global cooling" debate of the 1970s.

This place is located at the very heart of the global warming debate. Here's how you find it:

Strip away all the emotionalism and the hype involved in the debate. Once it's gone, ask yourself: what is left? That answer is where the "Save the Planet" people utterly refuse to look or acknowledge, because it's inconvenient to their side.

Here's what's left:

• A science that is deeply conflicted about global warming. There is no mainstream science community on global warming; mainstream science remains conflicted, despite the claims of the alarmists in the scientific community that they are the mainstream.
  

• Four billion years worth of cycles between global warming and global cooling, not just 500,000 or 500 million years that some are focusing all their attention on. And the long view shows global warming in the distant past, when the surface of Earth is much warmer than it is today; and it shows global cooling as well. And we're not talking about once or twice either; there's evidence of this happening over and over.
  

• Scientific evidence that shows a continuing trend of rising sea levels over the last 120,000 years and projections that show more of the same far into the future, whether we were here or not. And sea levels may have been over a hundred meters higher in the distant past than they are today, according to the same story linked above.

• The misconception that melting sea ice will raise sea levels. You want proof of this nonsense? Here's a quote from the link above: "Place some ice in a cup of water, and make a mark at the waterline. Wait for the ice to melt. Check the new water level. It won't change!" Ice melting over land and then running into the water WILL affect the sea level as it's new water being added to the mix.

• The true contribution of the sun to the global warming process as well as global cooling, and that these processes also take place on other planets as well as on Earth.

• The true contribution of forest fires and volcanoes to global warming. It's definitely understated, due to the difficulty in figuring how much carbon that burned plants and trees had in them before they were burned by fire, or how many plants actually went up. And they don't exactly put a meter on top of an erupting volcano to get an exact figure on how much greenhouse gas is being released. So if a data report doesn't openly say that the figures are estimates, that they're exact, they're not being truthful. It's rare to find statements like this, but they have been known to try to slip in the back door.

• The real estimate of man's contribution to what is primarily a naturally occurring phenomenon. There's no doubt that we've made the situation worse, but global warming is NOT man-made---a fact that seems to be denied by the "Save the Planet" folks. The simple fact is that we don't really know how much damage has been done. But global warming has been around a lot longer than we have.
  

• Mother Nature also doesn't punch a clock. For people to say that we only have ten years left to save the planet is utter nonsense. It's political rhetoric and emotionalism.
  

• What needs to be saved? The planet? NOT!! Our civilization is what needs to be saved. The planet will continue long after we've killed ourselves off, or left the cradle permanently.
  

• Global warming has happened; it will happen again, no matter what steps we take. As sure as the sun will rise and set this day, global warming will happen. We should try to take steps to reduce our impact on this naturally occurring phenomenon.

• Remember, this group of people was wrong about global cooling in the 1970s.
  

• Reducing pollution is a good goal, but the use of carbon "credits", a man-made folly, won't do it. That system is another way of putting money into someone else's pocket, in the name of reducing one's "carbon footprint," another money-grabbing invention. And whose pockets are the proceeds going into, might I ask? Those that are into this really need to follow the money trail and see which major polluters they're supporting with their green efforts.
  

I do think we need to reverse some patterns that we've gotten into.

The way we use fossil fuels should be altered, and then discontinued as it definitely affects the quality of the air that we breathe. And on a practical note, there's not enough supply to match the worldwide demand. This fact alone should demand that we develop technology and alternative fuels.

I also think we need to look at the global warming issue in a sane manner, not in this reckless fashion that politicians and some scientists are pushing us into. What if they're wrong again? How many trillions of dollars will have been wasted in combating a problem that either doesn't happen, or does happen--regardless of the steps that we take to "save the planet?"

This debate is much more complex than saving polar bears; the environment does need help. No one wants to live in a world where the air we breathe is poisoned, our water supplies are contaminated, and our food supply is threatened to the point where millions of people starve to death.

We ARE stewards of our world, and it's our responsibility to leave it cleaner than we found it. Each generation must make it better for the generation that follows it.

But let's do it without the fear-mongering that is present in today's debate.

NBC Unable to Strike a Deal With Rosie: This is Not a Bad Thing

Liberal network NBC/MSNBC/NBC Universal was unable to strike a deal with super-liberal Rosie O'Donnell on a new talk show that would have gone head-to-head with CNN's Larry King Live and the higher-rated Fox News shows. Some are sad; I am not.

Though I would have enjoyed Rosie vs. Trump III, I don't think that those back-and-forth insults between the two egomaniacs are worth giving her a platform to spew her venom again. Her tenure at The View (which I don't watch) required a "suspension of belief" (to quote a friend of hers) in some of the things that she said. The recaps of her outrageous statements and outright lies were bad enough, and I'm glad that she got out of the news.

The management team at NBC would be smart to keep Rosie out of the mix; NBC is screwed up enough as it is, without her help.

We Should Break Diplomatic Relations With Pakistan; Musharraf is No Friend of Democracy

It's time for the U.S. to break diplomatic relations with Pakistan until President/dictator Pervez Musharraf leaves office entirely.

His emergency rule decree is getting far worse: not only has he suspended Pakistan's constitution, and jailed lawyers and judges who oppose his unconstitutional moves, but now he's arrested former Prime Minister and opposition leader Benazir Bhutto and about 5,000 of her supporters to prevent a massive march scheduled for today.

President Bush needs to stop defending Musharraf; this guy is running the risk of turning Pakistan into another Iran, which we don't need. Today's situation inside Pakistan looks a lot like Iran in 1979, just before the Shah was thrown out. We have an unpopular dictator who is supported by the United States, and our President is supporting this dictator because he does what we want him to do.

It's going to backfire on us, big time, if we don't support the quest of Pakistan's people to restore democratic rule to the country.

State Requires Photo ID for Voting Now: This is a Good System, Despite Initial Problems

Michigan now requires voters to produce photo ID before voting in elections. It's a wonder that this step wasn't taken years ago. It's so common sense that it's ridiculous.

With all the reports of election irregularities over the last eight years, producing photo ID is a minor inconvenience. The election officials don't know who everyone is on sight and where they live, and for anyone to expect that is ridiculous.

And there are government issued IDs that the poor can acquire that are acceptable forms of identification as well. And if they don't want to obtain identification, they simply sign the form that says they are eligible to vote and they are who they say they are. So the argument that it's a discriminatory practice designed to suppress the economically downtrodden doesn't hold water.

The biggest problem lies with the training of poll workers, who did different things in the various precincts. There was some variance in the types of ballots that were issued: regular ballots should have been used for voters who signed the forms, but some provisional ballots were issued instead, which are treated differently and require further validation. Other poll workers rejected acceptable forms of ID, such as military-issued ID cards and Michigan driver's licenses, which is unfathomable.

Uniformity was present yesterday, but not in all the precincts.

There are definitely glitches to work out of the new system, but when they are worked out, it will make Michigan's voting system much stronger and more secure.

Marvel Comics Unveils New Captain America: New Superhero Carries a GUN??!

After Marvel Comics killed off Captain America in their Civil War series, it was thought that they might somehow bring the star-spangled hero back to life.

They did so, but the original Captain America will remain buried at Arlington National Cemetery.

Marvel has decided to introduce a new Captain America, with a new uniform, new attitude, and new armaments. This version of Captain America will carry a knife, guns, as well as the customary indestructible shield that was a staple item of the Captain America series since March of 1941, when the series began.

The original Captain America rarely had weapons other than his shield; this is not a welcome change.

The new series is a direct spin-off of the events of Civil War, and the new Captain America may be a clone of his original superhero sidekick, Bucky, who was reported killed fighting the Red Skull during World War II.

We'll see what happens.

Justice Prevails: Court Denies Convicted Murderer's Request to Receive His Slain Wife's Life Insurance Money

Scott Peterson, the man convicted of killing his wife and unborn child, was denied the proceeds from his wife's life insurance policy by a court in California.

The policy, which is worth a quarter million dollars, will go to Laci Peterson's mom.

Who wanted the money more--Scott Peterson, or his attorneys? If he had won the case, it would have been a HUGE miscarriage of justice.

Justice and victim's rights have taken a few steps forward in California.

"Dog" is IN the Doghouse: Racial Tirade Leads to Network Suspending Production of His "Dog the Bounty Hunter" Show

This has not been a very good couple of years for Duane "Dog" Chapman, the TV bounty hunter who has a popular TV show on the A&E network ("Dog the Bounty Hunter").

Mexico arranged for Dog to be arrested due to his hunting down a wanted criminal on Mexican soil in 2003, in violation of Mexican law. With days to go before a statute of limitations expired in the case, U.S. federal marshals arrested Dog in Hawaii in 2006, and a court battle ensued for the extradition of Dog to Mexico.

The Mexican government eventually changed it's mind about prosecuting Dog in 2007, and settled for an assurance that Dog wouldn't engage in bounty hunting on Mexican territory ever again.

Dog had numerous appearances on CNN, Fox News and other media outlets over the last year, following his arrest. Life seemed to be back on track.

Then, a couple of days ago, the National Enquirer posted an audio of a racially charged tirade (WARNING: OFFENSIVE LANGUAGE) by Dog against the African-American girlfriend of his son. Dog has started the apology "process" while A&E has stopped production of Dog's bounty hunting reality show, pending an investigation.

What is it with these celebrities self-destructing like this??!

Hillary Exposed for What She Is at Recent Debate: The Undisputed Queen of Flip-Floppers

Senator Clinton had a disastrous performance at the NBC Presidential Debate on Tuesday; the other candidates zeroed in on her two-minute flip-flops on positions and her non-committal responses to the questions.

A note to Senator Clinton: when one is taking both sides, one does not attempt do in front of the same audience within a two-minute time period. This was ASTONISHING to see. Did she not learn anything from "I actually did vote for the $87 billion before I voted against it" line of John Kerry in 2004?

As much as I don't care for his politics, Tim Russert correctly went after Hillary after she started playing both sides of the issues. Clinton's campaign teams were heard muttering that the moderator needed to be shot in a pathetic attempt at damage control. Perhaps if they did their jobs in preparing their candidate, they wouldn't have to shoot the moderator.

Poor Russert. Clinton wants to shoot him. And we still don't know where she stands; only that she's running against President Bush. Bush was mentioned 40 times during the debate; 25 of those mentions were by Hillary while she was busy dodging questions over what she stood for.

I think she knows Bush's positions better than she knows her own.

Law of the Seas Treaty (LOST) Needs to Get Lost: Both Houses Should Reject Treaty Immediately

The Law of the Seas Treaty (LOST) is an abomination in it's current form and should be rejected by the United States, not ratified.

The only things this treaty should address are piracy, war, salvage rights, emergency protocols on the high seas, and establishment of territorial waters.

If the U.N. wants to have treaties on protecting the oceans, preventing pollution, demilitarization of the high seas, placing all undersea mining operations under U.N. control, taxation, making the U.S. pay for the entire treaty (as the current version does), and giving the U.N. the right of eminent domain to give new technology to enemy countries, then the U.N. should draw up separate treaties and present them to members, not bind them into an over-broad LOST agreement.

And the fact that the world expects the US to pay for the treaty is ludicrous! The Senate needs to throw this treaty out the nearest window without a signature on it.

Here We Go Again: Michigan's Temporary Budget Expires in Five Days With Potential for Another Government Shutdown

Well, here we go again.

Michigan's budget crisis is back in our faces again. Legislators have failed to pass a single part of the seventeen-part budget since they got Governor Granholm to agree to a month-long extension of last year's budget 26 days ago.

And once again, Michigan is looking at the possibility of another government shutdown.

Both sides insist progress is being made and have adjourned until Monday.

They had better be right; because the sooner they pass it the sooner they can get into remedial communications classes to address their problems in talking with one another.

Russian Greed is Fueling Race to Claim North Pole Oil: They're Having Trouble Getting Oil Produced in Oil Fields They Already Have, & They Need More?

Russia's claim to the North Pole is being fueled by greed. Nothing else.

They have trouble getting oil out of the ground in their current oil fields, and they need more? That's about as ludicrous as Iran needing nuclear power.

Russia should live up to it's treaty obligations and stop this nonsense. And so should every other power currently jockeying for positions at the top of the world.

S-CHIP Nonsense: Program Doesn't Need to Have Budget Doubled: Just Kick the Adults Off and Into Medicaid and Use the Savings to Help More Kids---DUH!!

I'm getting fed up with this S-CHIP insurance nonsense.

Kick the adults off of it and put them into Medicaid. Then there'll be plenty of money to take care of kids. 700,000 adults are in the S-CHIP program; yet 500,000 eligible children are not.

DUH??!

First Medal Of Honor of Afghan War Awarded to Navy SEAL: Parents Accept Postumous Award

The first Medal of Honor of the Afghan War has been awarded to a deceased Navy SEAL whose team came under heavy Taliban attack in 2005. Lt. Michael P. Murphy died while calling for help for his four-man team that was outnumbered and surrounded by Taliban forces in a remote region of Afghanistan.

Two additional SEALs in his team died in the battle, and the chopper sent to rescue them was also shot down, killing all sixteen commandos and crew aboard. It was a disastrous day for U.S. Special Forces, but the nation chose to honor Lt. Murphy's courage and valor under enemy fire.

President Bush awarded the Medal to Lt. Murphy's parents in the White House on Monday.

The citation reads:

The President of the United States of America, in the name of Congress, takes pride in presenting the Medal of Honor to Lieutenant Michael P. Murphy, United States Navy, for conspicuous gallantry and intrepidity at the risk of his life, above and beyond the call of duty, as the leader of a special reconnaissance element with Naval Special Warfare Task Unit Afghanistan on 27 and 28 June 2005.

While leading a mission to locate a high-level anti-coalition militia leader, Lieutenant Murphy demonstrated extraordinary heroism in the face of grave danger in the vicinity of Asadabad, Konar Province, Afghanistan. On 28 June 2005, operating in an extremely rugged, enemy-controlled area, Lieutenant Murphy's team was discovered by anti-coalition militia sympathizers who revealed their position to Taliban fighters. As a result, between 30 and 40 enemy fighters besieged his four-member team.

Demonstrating exceptional resolve, Lieutenant Murphy valiantly led his men in engaging the large enemy force. The ensuing fierce firefight resulted in numerous enemy casualties, as well as the wounding of all four members of his team. Ignoring his own wounds and demonstrating exceptional composure, Lieutenant Murphy continued to lead and encourage his men. When the primary communicator fell mortally wounded, Lieutenant Murphy repeatedly attempted to call for assistance for his beleaguered teammates. Realizing the impossibility of communicating in the extreme terrain and in the face of almost certain death, he fought his way into an open terrain to gain a better position to transmit a call. This deliberate heroic act deprived him of cover, exposing him to direct enemy fire. Finally achieving contact with his headquarters, Lieutenant Murphy maintained his exposed position while he provided his location and requested immediate support for his team.

In his final act of bravery, he continued to engage the enemy until he was mortally wounded, gallantly giving his life for his country and for the cause of freedom. By his selfless leadership, courageous actions, and extraordinary devotion to duty, Lieutenant Murphy reflected great credit upon himself and upheld the highest traditions of the United States Naval Service.

"No" to Fred Thompson Too: Part-Time Campaign Won't Be Enough to Beat His Republican Rivals Now or Hillary in the General Election

Fred Thompson is not the man that conservatives were waiting for.

His part-time campaign is a joke at best. He's putting minimal preparation time in to campaigning, minimal appearances, and when Thompson chooses to appear, he delivers a five minute speech on what his vision of the country's direction will be. Five minutes??! His INTRODUCTION by a master of ceremonies takes five minutes, and Thompson's making five-minute speeches about his vision for America? A Boy Scout working on Communications Merit Badge can do THAT.

Where's the beef, Fred?

His GOP rivals are going to eat him alive if he keeps that up. And that's to say nothing of Hillary's well-oiled campaign machine waiting in the wings for whomever the GOP candidate will be. But I don't think it's going to be Fred.

The Sign that Says It All

Letter to Limbaugh from Senate Condemning Him Up to $800,000+ on E-Bay; Profits to be Donated to Charity

Rush Limbaugh is maximizing the splash from the Senate's "phony soldier" maxi-screw up by putting the letter that the Senate sent to his employer on E-Bay.

To recap, here's a partial write-up of an earlier post:

...Limbaugh was commenting on a soldier who had reported seeing/participating in atrocities in Iraq on a recently completed tour. The problem was that this "soldier" wasn't a soldier at all, and had never been in Iraq. Limbaugh referred to him--truthfully I might add--as a "phony soldier," and was immediately attacked by Media Matters and the usual crowd--as being an anti-military commentator who was going after soldiers who were opposed to the Iraq War. Again, several of the networks picked up the story and ran with it as their lead story for several days. Then the Senate Democrats got involved, demanding that Limbaugh and the company that syndicates his national radio show, Clear Channel Communications Inc., retract the "phony soldier" comment immediately. Senate Majority Leader Reid made a speech on the floor of the Senate, as did several of his colleagues. They even went so far as to sidetrack their already-sidetracked agenda and put together a letter that condemned Limbaugh and demanded the retraction. Forty-one Democratic Senators signed the letter.

The letter is up to over $800,000 on E-Bay. Profits are to be donated to a fund for the Marine Corps-Law Enforcement Foundation, which sees to the education children of Marines and law enforcement officers killed in the line of duty.

This letter is somewhat historical, as it is a very public attack (based on blatant lies) on a private citizen by part of the U.S. Congress. I hope it is bought by someone who will see to it that this document is displayed publicly and prominently as an example of politics run amok in Washington.

Sex Offenders Told Not to Participate in Trick or Treat Festivities: This is a Smart Move on Part of Law Enforcement Officials

Communities in many areas of the country are telling sex offenders to stay away from young people who are out trick or treating on Halloween.

This is a smart play on the part of law enforcement officials in those communities to help protect kids. They are also calling on parents to go with their kids. This is in response to recent child abduction cases that have captured national headlines.

At least ten states have "No Candy" regulations in place for Halloween; why don't all fifty states have them?

Iraq Orders Blackwater To Pack Up and Leave: U.S. Investigation Continuing

The Iraqi government has ordered mercenary outfit Blackwater USA out of the country over the shooting of nearly two dozen Iraqi non-combatants last month.

Their current contract will expire in May, though the Iraqis seem ready to demand that they leave much sooner than that. The State Department investigation is still ongoing, and SecState Rice will decide what happens next.

It's time for the mercenaries to find work elsewhere and not at U.S. taxpayer expense.

Nation Welcomes Dalai Lama to Washington: Religion-Banning Communist Heathens in Beijing Protest Visit

The White House and Congress welcomed the Dalai Lama to Washington and awarded him a Congressional Gold Medal, while the communist government in Beijing demanded that he not be awarded the medal, which is the highest civilian honor in this country.

China ought to get over it and engage the Dalai Lama in conversation, not try to control him.

And they can begin by returning the right of self-rule to Tibet and pulling it's troops out of there, immediately and forever.

And perhaps they ought to allow their own people to practice religion instead of suppressing it.

Get with the program, China.

Current Primary System Should Be Abolished in Favor of One National Primary Day: System is Over-Generous to Four States at the Expense of 46 Others

I'm in favor of abolishing the current primary system and establishing a single national primary day, where all states vote on the same day. No special consideration will be given to Iowa, South Carolina, New Hampshire, or Nevada.

The current system is unfair to the other 46 states that have issues of their own and will vote their own way regardless of what happens in the four favored states. Get rid of this system!

And the parties (the Democrats) ought to quit punishing Michigan and Florida for challenging the status quo. Shame on them for disenfranchising voters after CRYING about having all those disenfranchised voters in Florida in 2000, who they've turned on, by the way.

Hypocrites!

Nation Cannot Afford Hillary's Plan to Buy Off the Middle Class for Votes: We Need Someone Who Will Make CUTS to Spending, Not Shift It Around

Senator Clinton's statement "I have a million ideas. The country can't afford them all" is a major problem for the health of the country's budget.

She's already proposed $763 billion in new spending for her first term if she's elected. What's she going to cut to keep the budget in balance? Or is she simply going to move spending around from old programs to her new ones?

Recall Efforts Begin Against Members of Michigan's Legislature Who Voted for Tax Increases

An anti-tax group has launched recall efforts against five Democrats and five Republicans for their support of an increased income tax as part of Michigan's continuing budget crisis.

The governor has also not been formally targeted for recall yet, but at least two web sites are calling for it. Should be interesting to watch.

Presidential Candidates Who Boycott Michigan's Primary Shouldn't Be Accepting Michigan Campaign Money Either: They Should Return Money Given to Them

I don't think that any candidate who has pulled out of Michigan's primary should be accepting Michigan campaign donations either. They should return all monies donated to them by now-disenfranchised Michigan voters.

That includes the campaigns of Obama, Edwards, Richardson, and Biden.

A note to Michigan voters: vote for the other party or 3rd party if any of these people win the Democratic nomination. They're not worthy of your vote.

Parents Need to Monitor the Myspace Profiles of their Kids: They Put Phone Numbers, Addresses and Other Information in Plain Site for All to See

Myspace needs to do more to protect kids from themselves, and parents need to WATCH WATCH WATCH what their kids are putting up there.

I think Myspace should set the profiles of anyone under the age of 16 to "private" for starters. If a profile is set to private, a user has to have the profile owner's permission to view all the information contained there. If it's set to public, anyone on the planet can see the information at will.

Parents need to know that kids put their phone numbers and whatever else on their profiles for all to see, including predators. Once someone has a phone number, they can get an address through the Internet. It can be done in moments.

The amount of personal contact information given away on some public profiles is astonishing. Kids are more vulnerable, and parents need to get a handle on this problem. And Myspace and other social networking sites need to help them do it.

Michigan Advertising Company Hunts Bloggers Who Blogged Against It: First Amendment Rights vs. Slander vs. Privacy Issues Case Taking Shape

A Michigan advertising company has sued thirty unknown bloggers for going after it on their blogs, in forums, and on YouTube.

They've also gone after Internet Service Providers (ISP's) to provide them with identities of all thirty "John Does" and to help them identify who posted things about them on YouTube.

The company believes that it is part of a smear campaign by former distributors of theirs whose contracts were terminated by the company some time before. They've already beaten a lawsuit by former businesses that associated with them who claim that the Michigan company is part of some kind of pyramid and is illegal.

This is shaping up to be an interesting case that pits free speech vs. a possible slander against the company vs. privacy rights in general.

Some thoughts:

If this is a smear campaign on the part of some of their former or current employees, I don't care what the company does.

If they're wrong, and the bloggers are people who simply don't like their company or their products, then they should be left alone, which the company has said it would do. We'll see.

Should be interesting to see what happens.

Democratic Memo to Staffers on Getting Innoculations Before Going to NASCAR Races Has to Be a Joke: It Can't Be Real

This is one of those stories that are almost unbelievable.

Almost.

A staffer with the House Committee on Homeland Security sent out a memo to fellow staffers advising them to get inoculated before attending NASCAR races in Alabama and in North Carolina. Among the innoculations needed: Hepatitus A & B, tetanus, diphtheria, influenza, and others.

NASCAR fans responded by suggesting that NASCAR fans get inoculated against Congressional visits.

At first I thought it was a private e-mail/joke that became public, but apparently it's real. And the Republicans are sniping at the Democrats over it too. Both sides are going after NASCAR fans for support in the elections, but this error could cost the Democrats some potential undecided voters.

It's been interesting watching this unfold.

iBrick/iPhone Controversy: Some Observations

It's been nearly three months since the roll out of the overpriced Apple iPhone and a lot of things have happened since then. When the phone was made available for sale, people waited in lines for hours to spend hundreds of dollars on these phones, and the level of hype was nearly unparalleled.

Along with the iPhone, customers had to sign a two-year deal with AT&T in order to activate it. There was no small amount of grumbling on this point.

Then someone discovered a way to get around the Apple/AT&T alliance and altered their iPhone so that it could be used on other networks, such as Sprint. This is referred to as "unlocking the iPhone." Tens of thousands of iPhone owners followed suit, and the customer revolt was on. Third-party applications began appearing on the unlocked iPhones as the owners began installing software that Apple didn't approve of, and that a locked iPhone would prevent from being installed in the first place.

Apple fired back and released an update (Version 1.1.1) which disabled all altered iPhones that downloaded the update and turned the iPhones in question into "iBricks" which is a nickname for a disabled iPhone.

Within a week, hackers had figured out how to reverse Upgrade 1.1.1 and re-unlock the iPhones.

Some observations: I am of the opinion that Apple users and Apple Inc. think that they're smarter than one another. This point is playing out before our very eyes.

Think about it: Apple worked for years on the iPhone project, and then released it. iPhone owners figured out how to unlock the iPhone so it works on other networks and can use third-party software; Apple engineers figured out how to shut the altered iPhones down for their owners violating their user agreements (under the guise of improving stability of the iPhone and to offer more features), and hackers rolled back Upgrade 1.1.1 to re-enable their altered iPhones. The level of sheer brainpower being deployed by both sides is simply amazing to behold.

While the chess match taking place between iPhone owners and engineers at Apple is fascinating to watch, a lot of questions have been raised by this controversy.

Questions such as:

• Does Apple have a right to pick the cell phone network for the person who's spending hundreds of dollars buying the iPhone?
  
  
• Do iPhone users have the right to violate an agreement that they agree to simply by opening the box? And does Apple have the right to enforce an agreement that doesn't require the signature of the owner on a contract at the time of purchase?
  
  
• Does Apple have the right to disable the private property of their customers? Once money changes hands, an iPhone becomes a person's property. Doesn't it? My experience in retail tells me "yes it does."
  
  
• What do iPhone users end up with if they sign a two-year agreement with AT&T and then decide to unlock their iPhone? Monthly payments for 24 months, whether or not they're using the network. I know of one person who's in this very situation. They are now graced with two cell phone bills a month, and an iPhone that is no longer operational. I've used the term "idiot" in conversations with him when he moans about paying for nothing.

I'm officially neutral on this entire issue, but will watch the developments in the coming months with great interest.

Murtha Needs to Apologize to Exonerated Marines in Haditha Case: Former Marine or Not, He's Made a Mockery of Our System of Justice

For those that don't remember, United States Marines were accused by Time magazine and local Iraqis of slaughtering a family in the vicinity of Haditha, Iraq, back in 2005. The Marine Corps launched an investigation after the story broke, and Representative Jack Murtha took to the floor of the House and said the following:

"It's much worse than reported in Time magazine. There was no fire fight. There was no IED that killed these innocent people. Our troops overreacted because of the pressure on them and they killed innocent civilians in cold blood. And that's what the report is going to tell.

Now, you can imagine the impact this is going to have on those troops for the rest of their lives and for the United States in our war and our effort in trying to win the hearts and minds."

Note: the Marines had just launched their investigation, and no report was going to be made for months. The Marines decided that there was enough evidence to bring charges against eight of their fellows who were in the vicinity at the time. Almost immediately, the case began to fall apart.

It was alleged that the Marines invaded a house and began murdering people inside of it following an IED attack on their Marine unit, which resulted in the death of one of their squad members.

As the investigation progressed, investigators did blood tests to see if everyone was related. As it turned out, they were not. They also discovered that several people in the house were killed elsewhere, and at different times. Iraqi citizens contradicted their original statements and began changing their stories. Charges have been subsequently dropped or modified to lesser ones.

One of the accused Marines, the leader of the squad, accused and now exonerated, has sued Rep. Murtha for invasion of privacy, and for libel. No one's sure where that will end up.

At the very least, Murtha needs to apologize for trying the Marines in the court of public opinion just to score political points on President Bush. Murtha clearly jumped the gun in accusing the Marines, and he should be held accountable for that. And the sooner he does apologize for his blatant political rhetoric in this instance, the better. He's made a mockery of our criminal justice system, where the accused is innocent until PROVEN guilty, and that definitely hasn't happened.

Shame on Murtha!

U.S. Hiring of Mercenaries Needs to End: Blackwater Situation is Tip of Iceberg

There has been an ongoing debate as to whether or not security companies like Blackwater USA are, in fact, mercenary outfits.

Under the definitions adopted by UN Resolution 44/34, a mercenary is defined as this:

1. A mercenary is any person who:

(a) Is specially recruited locally or abroad in order to fight in an armed conflict;

(b) Is motivated to take part in the hostilities essentially by the desire for private gain and, in fact, is promised, by or on behalf of a party to the conflict, material compensation substantially in excess of that promised or paid to combatants of similar rank and functions in the armed forces of that party;

(c) Is neither a national of a party to the conflict nor a resident of territory controlled by a party to the conflict;

(d) Is not a member of the armed forces of a party to the conflict; and

(e) Has not been sent by a State which is not a party to the conflict on official duty as a member of its armed forces.

2. A mercenary is also any person who, in any other situation:

(a) Is specially recruited locally or abroad for the purpose of participating in a concerted act of violence aimed at:

(i) Overthrowing a Government or otherwise undermining the constitutional order of a State; or

(ii) Undermining the territorial integrity of a State;

(b) Is motivated to take part therein essentially by the desire for significant private gain and is prompted by the promise or payment of material compensation;

(c) Is neither a national nor a resident of the State against which such an act is directed;

(d) Has not been sent by a State on official duty; and

(e) Is not a member of the armed forces of the State on whose territory the act is undertaken.

Private Military Companies (PMCs) like Blackwater fit several of these descriptions. Note item #s 1b, 1d, 1e, 2b, 2c, and 2e. Part of 1c also applies. Item 2a(ii) is occurring unintentionally as Iraq is already unstable and deteriorating.


Some points:

• These security companies that are being used in Iraq ARE mercenaries under international law as outlined above. "Security contractors" is merely window dressing in PC talk.
  
• We don't pay our soldiers enough. They're good enough to be shot at, but not good enough to be paid well for their trouble? That's DISGRACEFUL.
  
• We pay soldiers for hire way too much. Period. The State Department should be using it's own people to protect their diplomats in Iraq, or work with the military to assign active duty troops to do it.
  
• The United States is not a party to the treaty that Resolution 44/34 establishes--the U.N. Mercenary Convention. That needs to change as this conflict begins to wind down and more troops begin to come home in 2008. The U.S. needs to sign this treaty.
• Iraq is trying to establish the rule of law in it's own territory, and having a mercenary army of 48,000 men not under their control or their laws firing indiscriminately at people isn't making matters any easier. It's fueling the insurgency and making matters worse.
  

In short, employing mercenaries isn't something that our government should be engaging in. And making them exempt from Iraqi laws while Iraq was under the direct control of the Coalition Provisional Authority has only added to the problems.

I think there's enough work around the world for these security companies to find and profit off of without getting entangled in parts of the world where the U.S. military is in action.

Ultra-Left Launches Two-Pronged Smear Campaigns Against Conservative Commentators; Senate Democrats Foolishly Get Involved

The ultra-left has gone after Bill O'Reilly and Rush Limbaugh with smear campaigns in the last few weeks that Senate Democrats found irresistible to avoid. They're on the wrong side--again.

Some background...Bill O'Reilly was on his radio show and was expressing his surprise at a recent visit to a Harlem-area diner, in which he saw that minority-population customers acted like everyone else. The Democratic organization Media Matters posted a clip of the clip on their web site and CNN and MSNBC jumped on the story a few days later, running it as their lead stories last week, making suggestions that O'Reilly was a racist.

O'Reilly fired back hard and other Conservative commentators--Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity--came to his defense.

Then this week, Limbaugh was commenting on a soldier who had reported seeing/participating in atrocities in Iraq on a recently completed tour. The problem was that this "soldier" wasn't a soldier at all, and had never been in Iraq. Limbaugh referred to him--truthfully I might add--as a "phony soldier," and was immediately attacked by Media Matters and the usual crowd--as being an anti-military commentator who was going after soldiers who were opposed to the Iraq War. Again, several of the networks picked up the story and ran with it as their lead story for several days.

Then the Senate Democrats got involved, demanding that Limbaugh and the company that syndicates his national radio show, Clear Channel Communications Inc., retract the "phony soldier" comment immediately. Senate Majority Leader Reid made a speech on the floor of the Senate, as did several of his colleagues. They even went so far as to sidetrack their already-sidetracked agenda and put together a letter that condemned Limbaugh and demanded the retraction. Forty-one Democratic Senators signed the letter.

I have a few things to say about that.

O'Reilly kind of screwed up by using words that had double-meanings. He should have thought twice about revealing his apparent ignorance, but the clip of the clip used by the media and Media Matters was unfair. They didn't bother playing what O'Reilly said before and after the comment in question.

Limbaugh didn't screw up. It's the Senate Democrats who royally screwed up by going on with such a blatant lie. Their condemnation of Rush (a private citizen--not an elected official) during Senate working hours is further testimony to Reid's failed leadership, the derailed Democratic agenda, and the ineptitude of the Democratic majority to recover their lost momentum. Furthermore, the Democrats who signed Reid's letter are accomplices of the lies told by one man who is a "phony soldier." The words "swindlers" and "liars" fit in here somewhere.

The smart Democrats were the ones who didn't sign Reid's letter.

I object to taxpayer resources and time being used in the manner that the Senate Democrats have displayed in the last couple of days. It's the Democrats who should apologize to Limbaugh and to their constituents for participating in this utter farce.

Michigan Government Shuts Down, Then Opens for Business After Budget Deal Reached

Michigan shut down for a few hours early on Monday morning before a budget deal was reached at around 4am this morning.

It's about time!

Under the deal, the income tax will be increased, and some services will be required to charge a 6% state sales tax.

Now, then, I think that every member of the state house and senate should not run for re-election. Their utter stupidity and failure to communicate brought us to the brink of not having a government running the day-to-day operations of the state. Posturing for brownie points for MONTHS, blaming the other side, accepting no blame for their own actions--it's a political problem that requires action.

They should redeem themselves by not running for office again. The current officeholders are unworthy of the authority that the voters have bestowed on them. This should have been agreed to weeks or months ago, not four hours into a SHUTDOWN OF THE STATE GOVERNMENT.

Shame on ALL OF THEM!

Governor Granholm Issues Layoff Notices to 35,000 State Workers: State Shutdown as of Monday at 12:01AM

Our elected state government in Lansing is failing to come to agreement on Michigan's 2007-2008 budget, and Governor Granholm has begun to take steps to shut down the state government. Under Michigan's constitution, the state cannot spend one cent unless a balanced budget is in place.

The state isn't running out of money; it simply will not have the authority to spend anything.

Democrats and Republicans each control one house in the state legislature and they've adopted contradicting bills on what to tax, and what to cut in order to get rid of a forecasted $1.8 billion shortfall.

Once this crisis is resolved, I think the voters of Michigan need new leadership in the state legislature. This is going to be quite embarrassing if the government needs to shut down. John Schneider over at the Lansing State Journal called this situation a "slow motion train wreck" and he's absolutely right.

Editorials in many Michigan newspapers are calling for this stupidity to end and for both sides to compromise. I agree. These people need to get off their fat lazy asses and MOVE IT!

You have two friggin' hours!

Iran Considers Nuclear Matter a Closed Political Topic; Wants Discussion to Focus on Legal and Technical Aspects

Iran's President had his fifteen minutes in front of world leaders on Tuesday, and he let everyone who was listening have it.

"It" was a rambling speech against the West and against the Security Council. He declared the political aspect of the debate against Iran's nuclear program "closed" and wanted the discussion to focused on technical and legal issues.

Fat chance.

Iran does have the right to pursue peaceful nuclear technology as every nation does, but the "peaceful" part is being questioned in Iran's case, as it has threatened to blow Israel off the map and is shipping bombs across their border into Iraq. Their posture is anything but peaceful.

Iran has every intention of developing nuclear weapons. His blatant lies at Columbia University and the fact that he denied it is all the proof we need. Iran wants blood, not peace.

Government About to Hit Debt Limit Again; Bush Administration to Ask for an Additional $950 Billion on Credit Limit

Here we go again with the debt limit. Not content with the $9 trillion plus debt ceiling, the Bush Administration requested that Congress extend the ceiling by an additional $950 billion.

That's quite ENOUGH!

This government needs to make more than it spends and lower it's debt load to a more manageable level before it's too late. $10 trillion is too much debt. It must spend our taxpayer money much more conservatively.

The trade deficit is of particular concern; as is the devaluation of the U.S. dollar against other major world currencies. I do think the brakes should be put on free trade agreements until the damage from NAFTA and CAFTA are fully assessed. Whoever said that the North American Free Trade Agreement would create a sucking sound from south of our border has definitely been proven correct.

But of more concern is this government's willingness to outspend how much it makes. Income must always exceed expenses. I think that the next President is going to have to make major cuts across the board in order to get the country's budget back into order.

And Congress is going to have to stop earmarking as they're contributing more than their fair share to the debt load with their peanut storage facilities and bridges to nowhere. The days of blank checks from the government for useless projects must become a thing of the past if the country's financial situation is to recover quickly from the financial disaster we're in.

Iranian President Looked Like a Two-Bit Dictator at Columbia University: Debate Over His Appearance Likely to Continue

When I heard that Columbia University had invited Iran's two-bit terrorist thug/President to speak before his address to the U.N. General Assembly, I was not happy. How could a university invite a murderer and a terrorist to it's campus to speak, yet allow an on-stage assault on a Minuteman speaker last year?

And then they took the trouble to invite him back for a speech this year, then dis-invited him.

Columbia's double-standard on speakers is astonishing. They'd rather invite someone whose troops and bombs have killed HUNDREDS of American troops in Iraq and THOUSANDS of Iraqi civilians. This is deeply offensive.

The aggressive posturing of Columbia's president in his introduction of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and the subsequent question & answer session (which was amusing and showed who this man really is--a terrorist, a liar, a Holocaust denier and a total idiot) did not lessen the offense that Columbia committed when they invited this man to speak in the first place.

Columbia's statement about being open to free speech by all is a quaint lie as well. They stood by as Columbia students charged the stage while the Minuteman was giving his speech last year; all they did was show Minuteman founder Jim Gilchrist the door.

Hypocrisy is alive and well at Columbia.

Michigan Government STILL Without a Budget; 10 Days to Government Shutdown

I think serious attention needs to be paid to what's happening with our Michigan government and how it's being run.

They've been working on a budget for eight months, and they've wasted time on unnecessary political posturing, delays, and outright refusal to budge on their established positions to score points on the other side.

In ten more days, this government WILL shut down if they don't have their act together and a balanced budget. Do we need to chain the state senators and representatives to their desks and lock the doors to get these people to move, or what?

OJ Simpson Trial is Already a Media Circus: It's Only Going to Get Worse

The media is already in a feeding frenzy over the OJ Simpson arrest, and it's going to get a lot worse. It'll probably be twice as bad as his double-murder trial; we're going to get bombarded with news about OJ around the clock for months to come.

My only hope is that the judge isn't as inept as the judge in Simpson's first trial. At least it won't be him, or that crybaby judge in Florida who handled the custody case for Anna Nicole Smith's baby. Hopefully the judge who gets this case will put a gag order on everyone involved in the case so that the trial isn't played out in the media any more than it already has.

And he (or she) keeps the lawyers in their places and under control. And keeps the TV cameras out of the courtroom; that'll keep everyone grounded and focused.

OJ Simpson Arrested for Armed Robbery: He's Not Getting Off This Time

OJ Simpson appears to have returned to his pre-football street hood roots, participating in a number of small crimes over the last ten years, before participating in an act of armed robbery in Las Vegas over the weekend.

He gets $4.3 million a year from the NFL for his retirement, yet he finds it necessary to rob someone with some help from his compatriots at gunpoint over a few trivial pieces of sports memorabilia? How small he's become. Why didn't he buy the things back?

He's not going to get away with it this time, as he did for the murders of Nicole Brown and Ron Goldman in 1994-1995. He needs to be stopped and that overinflated ego of his needs to be deflated a bit. And then he needs to be permanently forgotten. He craves the attention he's getting, and is betting that he'll be able to spit at the criminal justice system again.

This man is OUT of his mind.

And it might be pointed out that if he had put $3 million of that $4.3 million pension toward paying off the civil judgment against him in the matter of the deaths of his two victims starting in 1996, he'd have paid it off last year. But he's declined to do even that, thumbing his nose up at the system.

France Tells the World to Prepare for War Against Iran: Believes Force Will Be Required to Stop Iran's Renegade Nuclear Program

France's foreign minister told the world that a war with Iran may be necessary to put a stop to Iran's nuclear program once and for all.

Oh, really?

And how many troops, aircraft and ships will France and the rest of the world be contributing toward fighting this war? And is France willing to duke it out with Russia and China in the U.N. Security Council? And how many minesweepers will it send to the Persian Gulf to help clear the minefields that Iran is sure to deploy if fighting does break out?

Let France and its allies lead the fight against Iran, and we'll support them for a change instead of us carrying the workload and begging the world for help. We have two wars to wrap up before we mix it up with Iran.

Is Alan Greenspan Running for Something?

With former Federal Reserve chairman Alan Greenspan's new book about to be released on Tuesday, some of the media outlets--most notably CNN and 60 Minutes--obtained copies early and were quoting passages from the new book almost incessantly. The only thing that got him out of the headlines were the antics and arrest of OJ Simpson in Las Vegas.

Some of the most-quotes passages (quoted, I might add, with the same kind of reverence shown to the Bible during Sunday services) included Greenspan's opinion that the Iraq War was largely over oil, about how the Republicans had sacrificed principles for power, and that the Republicans deserved to lose as badly as they did in the last election.

This sounds like Greenspan is running for something at the same time that he's promoting his book. I don't think this is the end of this story.

People Must Use Caution on Social Networking Sites: Stuff Posted Can Come Back and Bite the User HARD

People do not understand how much damage they can do to their careers and reputations with postings and photos on such social networking sites as Myspace and FaceBook. Employers, universities and interviewers troll these sites, looking for what their current/prospective employees and students are posting, and how they are presenting themselves to the entire world.

As a general rule, if it looks or feels inappropriate to post to one of these kinds of sites, then it probably is. Profiles should be squeaky clean with the person's best foot forward. Scandalous postings and photos should be avoided at all costs. Some examples of people getting in trouble because of what they post:

• An education student at a university was denied a degree because the school administrators found pictures of her on her profile, which showed her partying. They felt the photo was unprofessional and gave her a degree in English but declined to give her the teaching certificate.
  
  
• A man was fired from his job as a school bus driver and a volunteer firefighter after he and his wife posted nude photos of him on Myspace.
  
  
• A Wal-Mart employee was fired for joking on his Myspace blog that he was going to bomb the store. He was subsequently denied unemployment because he made a threat. Duh!!
  
  
• A judge in Las Vegas was fired for his Myspace profile. He wrote that one of his interests was to "break his foot off in a prosecutor's ass" which made his impartiality during trials questionable.
  
  
• A sheriff's deputy in Florida(?) was fired for posting his bad habits on Myspace and his joking about putting people in jail.
  
  
• Another deputy was fired for posting racially and sexually inappropriate stuff on his Myspace profile.
  

There are hundreds of cases like the ones above.

People can put what they want on their profiles, but they only have themselves to blame if their photos and postings come around and bite them in the ass when they least expect it.

Use caution when using a social networking site.

Soldiers Want Politicians to Embed With Them in Iraq: Now That's a GREAT Idea

The wars in Iraq and Afghanistan have seen the beginning of something new inside U.S. military units who are engaged in combat: reporters embedded with the troops. They traveled with the troops, ate and slept next to them in the dirt, ate the dirt when the troops did, and shared the danger. And they reported as combat was ongoing.

Now some soldiers want Congress to spend some time in the dirt with them, too. Having members of Congress embed with the U.S. military??! That's a GREAT idea. This should be put into effect immediately with a six-month rotation (with no going home for Thanksgiving or Christmas either--their units will be overseas--they should be too.)

A firmer understanding of what the military is going through would be beneficial to Congress. Of course, this will NEVER happen. But it's an interesting idea.

Alternative Fuels Need to be Made of Something that Doesn't Pull Food or Ingredients Out of the Agricultural Sector: Corn Experience Shows Us Why

Many nations have decided (in the last couple of years) to ramp up their production of corn-based ethanol. The interest in getting in on a lucrative alternative fuel market was overwhelming to those nations, but the effort has caused some spin-off problems.

People in Mexico began noticing that food products made of corn (like tortillas) began to rise dramatically; protests broke out across Mexico. Similar things happened in other countries across the world; the loudmouth leader of communist Venezuela was braying like an elephant about it.

In this country, it had an effect on the price of milk, cheeses, corn products and other products: soap and ice cream are experiencing shortages of corn-based ingredients, which may actually cause shortages as well as price increases.

That shouldn't be happening, but it is. There's only so much land in temperate zones that are dedicated solely to corn production. Any diversion of corn away from the food processing market will cause consumer prices to rise at the grocery stores. That isn't a good idea.

Brazil seems to have the best solution for ethanol production: they're using sugar cane, which doesn't have as huge an impact on grocery prices as corn does.

This is a major stumbling block in the search for an alternative fuel. I don't know what the solution is.

Frank Talk on New Orleans: Should We Rebuild a City That's Below Sea Level So It Can Be Flooded Again?

Now that the second anniversary of Hurricane Katrina has come and gone, we really need to reconsider whether we should rebuild New Orleans--a city that sits below sea level and is sinking.

Not a lot of progress has been made in rebuilding New Orleans as it was. Funding has stalled, and many people from the city have decided to resettle where they are. It's safe to say that the recovery hasn't gone well. And before too much money is spent on the sinkhole, a few design changes should be considered.

There's still 120,000 buildings in New Orleans that have been condemned and need to be taken down. 80% of the city was flooded and mold has a firm foothold in those places. The clean-up should be finished as those buildings are health and safety hazards.

I don't think taxpayer dollars should be used to move people back into the bulls-eye. We'll be right back to two years ago with a flooded sinkhole the next time a major hurricane targets the area.

Homeowners Need to insure Their Houses to Full Replacement Value: Too Many Don't and Won't Have Enough Insurance Money to Rebuild if Disaster Strikes

One of the biggest frustrations that I had when working at an insurance agency was arguing with policyholders over how much their homes were worth versus how much it would cost to rebuild their homes if they were totally destroyed. The two numbers are definitely not the same.

And that may come as a surprise to some.

The cost of building materials increases many times faster than a property's retail value does. As we've seen from the collapsed housing market, a house may not sell for what it's worth at all. But the cost of the materials used to build the house and the labor involved doesn't drop in price. Building material costs have increased anywhere from 3-6% a year.

Labor costs have also increased exponentially as well. That is figured into replacement cost.

Unfortunately, insuring the house to it's full replacement value usually costs more in premiums, which most people don't like. That's understandable. But if the house is protected to replacement value, that's a well-protected asset.

Let's play with some numbers:

You own a house that is appraised at $50,000. Your insurance company informs you that it would cost you $175,000 to put it back up if it were left in ruins by fire or by a tornado.

You tell the insurance company that they're full of it and tell them you want your home insured to $50,000. Bad move. The insurance agent either does what you want them to over their explicit objections (real bad move) or tells you to go find another insurance agency. For this instance, we'll assume that the agent does what you want and writes the policy for $50,000.

Some months later, a tornado blows through and severely damages your house. One inner wall is left standing; everything else is rubble.

You start to rebuild and the insurance company sends a check for $50,000. The builder tells you that another $150,000 is needed to complete the construction. Uh oh.

You storm over to your insurance company and ask--"Where's the rest of my ^#$^# money??!" and the agent tells you "You insured your house to $50,000. I warned you. Sorry." That's when the screaming really starts.

Replacement coverage would cover the entire amount with minimal difficulty.

This scenario is playing out in my area right now. A tornado blew through our area on August 24th and took out two dozen homes. Some of the victims have been on the news, saying that they didn't have home owners insurance, or didn't have enough coverage to rebuild. That's really sad.

Others have already had their homes demolished and are preparing to rebuild on the same spot, though the neighborhood is still in ruins.

It may cost more in the short run, but people should protect their homes with replacement value on their insurance policies.

Michigan is Without a Budget and Less Than Three Weeks Away from a Government Shutdown: They Need to Get Moving

There's a complicated fight going on in Lansing over the state budget, and there's less than three weeks before Michigan's government runs out of money and a shutdown of the state occurs.

The battle looks like this:

Governor Granholm vs. the Republicans
Democrats vs. Republicans and vice versa in both houses
House vs. Senate

The first two fights mentioned above were expected; the third popped up unexpectedly. The state senate is controlled by the GOP; the state house is under control of the Democrats. Each house is challenging the other to take action first to cut out a $1.8 billion budget shortfall for next year.

They've been at it for seven months now.

Enough of the posturing, people. Fix the budget, NOW.

Michigan Moves It's Primary Election to January 15th; This is Unwise, But Does Challenge a Double-Standard That's Unfair

Michigan joined Florida in defying the double-standard that both parties have in allowing four states to vote earlier than all others.

I am not in agreement with this decision.

I do agree that it does challenge an unfair double-standard that needs to be changed. But at what cost? Michigan will be punished and it's voters in both parties will be disenfranchised by a corrupt political system that favors four states over all others. And the primaries are already too early.

The Bush vs. Kerry campaign of 2004 was pure agony. It went on far too long and was incredibly expensive for both parties to stage. As with how 2008 will be, 2004's primary season ended way too early. And we were stuck with two candidates--one who flip-flopped like a fish out of water, and the other with a huge anchor tied around his neck with "Iraq" stenciled on it.

Does anyone really want a loooooong campaign in '08?

FEMA Should be Separate from Homeland Security; DHS is Too Clunky

This is a return to an old theme, but since it doesn't appear to be happening as some have suggested, I'm going to revisit it.

Two years ago, in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina, I wrote that the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) needed to be separated from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) as DHS was overbuilt and too unwieldy to move quickly in a disaster. And since that time, Congress has held hearings, FEMA people have resigned, and a lot of window dressing has taken place.

It's not enough.

FEMA should be an independent agency that can move it's assets around at will without going through several layers of DHS bureaucracy to get permission to do so. This was the primary reason for the slowness of FEMA to get into position prior to Katrina and to mobilize once the hurricane roared ashore and swamped New Orleans. The left hand had no idea what the right hand was doing.

The only reason that FEMA should be subordinate to DHS is in the event of a terrorist-related disaster. FEMA needs it's own budget, it's own chain of command, and a direct line to the White House with a cabinet-level secretary.

This needs to happen and soon.

WWE Suspends Ten Wrestlers: Drug Violations are Reason

World Wrestling Entertainment, under tremendous pressure from the public, Congress, and the media, suspended ten of its wrestlers--including some of their main event talent-- for drug violations.

Suspended were Mr Kennedy (the hypocrite), Chavo Guerrero (brother of the late WWE champion Eddie Guerrero), Gregory Helms, Randy Orton, John Morrison, Shoichi Funaki, Charlie Haas, Umaga, William Regal and Edge.

These wrestlers are in trouble because a pharmacy that they all do business with sells steroids to people without requiring them to see a doctor or having a doctor's prescription. The wrestlers were discovered as being clients by police who have access to the seized records of the pharmacy in question.

Prosecutors contacted WWE who suspended the wrestlers. Also linked to this company via seized records are accused murderer and deceased WWE wrestler Chris Benoit, and the late Brian "Crush" Adams as well as Eddie Guerrero.

I think it's too late to save this generation of wrestlers from early death. They know the terrible consequences of their steroid abuse; they know they're breaking their work rules and, more importantly--the law; and they know the long-term effects that steroid abuse has on their health. Yet they use the drugs regardless of the consequences.

There comes a point where the damage becomes irreversible and it becomes a matter of time before they have fatal heart attacks. I think we're in for a lot of sad news in the coming months and years as wrestlers continue to die young from their steroid and drug abuse. For some it's already too late to save their lives, even if they stop this insanity immediately. The damage doesn't reverse itself if the abuse stops. It festers and then strikes when the unsuspecting wrestler least expects it.

I think wrestlers who abuse steroids and drugs are too damned selfish to think about what's going to become of their wives and children after they die. It's utter stupidity and sheer madness to risk one's family on a gamble as they do, every time they inject themselves with liquid death.

Brain cells must be the first thing to go. What other explanation is there?

Bye Bye Gonzales: Now They Can Get Someone to Take Control of Justice Department

Washington is breathing a sigh of relief as Alberto Gonzales tendered his resignation today as Attorney General. At the same time, everyone is holding their breath waiting for President Bush to name the next target on the shooting range. The confirmation process is likely to be a brutal affair.

I didn't like Gonzales any more than I liked Reno or Ashcroft. That's three Attorney Generals in a row who did more damage to the rule of law regarding the Department of Justice than any three prior to them.

All three used their power to shield their respective Presidents from needed probes to determine if they broke the law.

The DOJ needs to get a handle on the Patriot Act as the FBI has been abusing the living daylights out of it since it's inception. Gonzales gave the impression that he didn't know what was happening in his department. That's why I didn't like him.

Good bye, Gonzales. I hope the President does a much better job in selecting someone who isn't one of his friends for the Attorney General position. The DOJ is not the President's personal shield against investigations of wrongdoing. But the last two Presidents have treated it like that, and that needs to end. And the sooner the better.

Democrats Punish Florida for Voting to Have Very Early Primary: Michigan Will Be Next if Bill Proposing Early Primary Here Passes

Florida officials have been told by the Democratic National Committee that they will not have a single vote counted during the primary elections if it doesn't move it's primary into February. The DNC has a rule that says only certain primaries are to be held in January of an election year; Florida chose to ignore the rule.

It's actually a continuation of a double-standard. Iowa, Nevada, New Hampshire and South Carolina are the only states allowed to have a primary election in January.

There should be no primaries earlier than June 1st. Does anyone out there really have the stomach for Clinton/Obama vs. Guiliani/McCain for nine months, following a too-long primary season with too many candidates? BLEAH!

A three month Presidential campaign is much more preferable.

But Michigan is heading into trouble as well, if their proposal to move their primary into mid-January passes. It probably won't, but it's passed one house already. I don't think the other house of the Michigan legislature and Democratic Governor Granholm would allow this to move forward.

Disenfranchisement of voters on either side is not a good thing. Elections need to be free of this perception, or else we'll have a repeat of the 2000 Presidential Election fiasco in Florida. It's unlikely that the DNC will back down, so I hope Florida does.

People Who Engage in Any Part of Dogfighting are SCUM: They Need to Be in Jail

It's high time that authorities go after those who are engaged in dogfighting "entertainment" and punish everyone involved to the fullest extent of the law. That means those who raise the dogs to fight, those who organize the fights, those who attend the fights, those who gamble on them, and everyone in between who have knowledge about organized dogfights that take place and fail to report them.

This is a cruel, inhumane activity that requires aggressive community policing and prosecutions of those who are involved.

In this matter alone, I am in total agreement with PETA, who has been calling for more aggressive enforcement of the laws for quite some time.

The arrest and conviction of a prominent professional football player--whose name will not be mentioned by me--has brought some much-needed spotlight to a problem that is growing around the country. It has to STOP.

Edwards and Obama Employ Their Wives to Attack Hillary's Positions: Canidates' Families Are Getting Into It

John Edwards and Barak Obama have been taking a back seat to their wives lately, allowing them to go after Hillary Clinton's positions themselves.

Are Mrs. Edwards and Mrs. Obama running for President themselves? It sounds an awful lot like they are, telling their husbands to shut up and stand aside while they take care of Hillary as well as their other opponents.

Elizabeth Edwards attacked Obama's "holier-than-thou" attitude on Iraq, and Clinton on her "lack of leadership on health care and Iraq."

Michelle Obama went after Clinton's example of family: "If you can't run your own house, you certainly cannot run the White House." But she has also joked about her husband's big ears, his not putting the butter away, his funny name, and so on. Analysts aren't sure of what to make of her.

I'm waiting for Bill Clinton to jump in on this so that the three-way dance will be complete.

Seems like the spouses of the candidates are really getting into this campaign, which is a little unusual. And the candidates are not returning fire, either, ignoring the barbs coming from the candidates' families.

It's been quite a while since the Democratic side has been this interesting in a Presidential campaign.

Congress's Job Approval Rating: 18% vs. President Bush's 32%:

The Gallup Poll released it's most recent batch of job approval numbers for Congress and President Bush. 18% of Americans approve of the way Congress is doing it's job, while 32% approve of the way President Bush is doing his job.

This Congress is tied with the 1992 Congress, which was in the middle of a check-bouncing scandal at the time the poll was taken back then.

This is precisely why I think that control of Congress is going to change hands back and forth for some time to come. The American public is in the sort of mood that they'll turn politicians out of office until they find someone who does the job that they were sent to Washington to do. I think we're in for a lot of one-term Representatives and Senators from both parties.

And I don't think that's a bad thing either.

Utah Mining President Bungles Rescue Communication: Families Outraged by His Bombastic Comments

I've been watching the story of the mine collapse in Utah with a growing sense of horror.

The president/owner of the Murray mining company has acted irresponsibly, giving false hope to the families of the missing miners. And he kept leading them on. It's just like the Sago mine disaster in West Virginia, where communications got royally screwed up and celebrations of joy went to sobs of sorrow within seconds.

They've all but given up the rescue efforts, saying that the miners may never be found. Unacceptable. The families need to be able to bury their loved ones.

I thought that they would have learned something from the Sago fiasco, but Mr. Murray got up there and re-created the same mistakes from the very first day. That was no earthquake that caused the collapse; seismologists and the government say that the seismic activity was the mine collapsing. The lack of seismic activity in areas beyond the mine itself is telling.

This guy is more bombastic than Jacques Chirac, the former president of France. For someone with as much experience as he has, he should have known better.

And now he's disappeared from the public eye, leaving the breaking of the bad news to his partners and subordinates. This guy needs to stay away from the press and the families.